Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699517›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Interaural asymmetry of dynamic range: Abnormal fusion, bilateral interference, and shifts in attention.

Sean R Anderson, Frederick J Gallun, Ruth Y Litovsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Binaural fusion: Complexities in definition and measurement.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean R AndersonWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Frederick J GallunDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Ruth Y LitovskyWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Directional Hearing in Complex Auditory EnvironmentsR01DC003083 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LITOVSKY, RUTH Y · 2004 to 2020
$7.4M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
Mechanisms that underlie poorer binaural outcomes in patients with asymmetrical hearing and bilateral cochlear implantsF31DC018483 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ANDERSON, SEAN R · 2020 to 2021
$65k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC018483NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech information in the better ear interferes with the poorer ear in patients with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) who have large asymmetries in speech intelligibility between ears. The goal of the present study was to assess how each ear impacts, and whether one dominates, speech perception using simulated CI processing in older and younger normal-hearing (ONH and YNH) listeners. Dynamic range (DR) was manipulated symmetrically or asymmetrically across spectral bands in a vocoder. We hypothesized that if abnormal integration of speech information occurs with asymmetrical speech understanding, listeners would demonstrate an atypical preference in accuracy when reporting speech presented to the better ear and fusion of speech between the ears (i.e., an increased number of one-word responses when two words were presented). Results from three speech conditions showed that: (1) When the same word was presented to both ears, speech identification accuracy decreased if one or both ears decreased in DR, but listeners usually reported hearing one word. (2) When two words with different vowels were presented to both ears, speech identification accuracy and percentage of two-word responses decreased consistently as DR decreased in one or both ears. (3) When two rhyming words (e.g., bed and led) previously shown to phonologically fuse between ears (e.g., bled) were presented, listeners instead demonstrated interference as DR decreased. The word responded in (2) and (3) came from the right (symmetric) or better (asymmetric) ear, especially in (3) and for ONH listeners in (2). These results suggest that the ear with poorer dynamic range is downweighted by the auditory system, resulting in abnormal fusion and interference, especially for older listeners.

Indexed as

agingbinaural hearingdichotic speechdynamic range compressioninteraural asymmetryphonological fusionspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID36699517
PMCPMC9869277
OpenAlexW4315491285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.