Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699488›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

The perspective of staff members of two forensic psychiatric clinics in German-speaking Switzerland on the introduction of recovery orientation: An explorative study.

Susanne Schoppmann, Joachim Balensiefen, André Nienaber, Stefan Rogge, Henning Hachtel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanne SchoppmannDepartment of Education, Research and Practice Development, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK) Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Joachim BalensiefenDepartment of Education, Research and Practice Development, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK) Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
André NienaberNursing Directorate, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK) Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefan RoggeForensic Department, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK) Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Henning HachtelForensic Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK) Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery orientation (RO) is directed at living a worthwhile life despite being impaired by the constraints of mental illness. Although being quite common in general psychiatry in Switzerland, the dual mission of forensic psychiatry-safeguarding and therapy-challenges the idea of establishing RO as a work philosophy in this context. This explorative study qualitatively investigates baseline expectations and professional perspectives of forensic staff members concerning the idea of establishing RO in Swiss forensic psychiatric wards. Thereby, three central themes were worked out, namely "challenges associated with recovery," "expected barriers," and "possible recovery-oriented interventions." From a general point of view, the staff members were uncertain whether RO interventions could be introduced at all, and if so, to what extent. This, on the one hand, had to do with structural obstacles such as security requirements; however, personal obstacles in the form of different, sometimes contradictory attitudesand ideals and fearful anticipations-such as the loss of authority and power-also played a central role. As forensic psychiatric wards are non-existent in Latin-speaking Switzerland, the study does only refer to the German-speaking language region.

Indexed as

focus groupsforensic inpatient psychiatryobstacles and challengespersonal recoverystaff attitudes

Identifiers

PMID36699488
PMCPMC9870309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.