Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699450›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Multi-view graph convolutional network for cancer cell-specific synthetic lethality prediction.

Kunjie Fan, Shan Tang, Birkan Gökbağ, Lijun Cheng, Lang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Application of Graph Neural Networks to Extract Candidate Genes and Biological Associations.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. MVASA-HGN: multi-view adaptive semantic-aware heterogeneous graph network forQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Using graph-based model to identify cell specific synthetic lethal effects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kunjie FanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Shan TangCollege of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Birkan GökbağDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Lijun ChengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Lang LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lethal (SL) genetic interactions have been regarded as a promising focus for investigating potential targeted therapeutics to tackle cancer. However, the costly investment of time and labor associated with wet-lab experimental screenings to discover potential SL relationships motivates the development of computational methods. Although graph neural network (GNN) models have performed well in the prediction of SL gene pairs, existing GNN-based models are not designed for predicting cancer cell-specific SL interactions that are more relevant to experimental validation

Indexed as

deep learninggraph neural networksmulti-omicssynthetic lethalitysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID36699450
PMCPMC9868610
OpenAlexW4313890362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.