Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699423›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2023

Characteristics of Donors and Modelling of the Characteristics to Possible Forecast the Repeat Donors Profile at Thammasat University Hospital.

Kamphon Intharanut, Phichapat Nimnuch, Wachirada Naiwijarn, Worakamon Pimsiri, Onruedee Khantisitthiporn, Oytip Nathalang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kamphon IntharanutGraduate Program in Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumtani, 12120 Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2978-1432
Phichapat NimnuchBlood Bank, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathumtani, 12120 Thailand.
Wachirada NaiwijarnDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumtani, 12120 Thailand.
Worakamon PimsiriDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumtani, 12120 Thailand.
Onruedee KhantisitthipornDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumtani, 12120 Thailand.
Oytip NathalangGraduate Program in Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumtani, 12120 Thailand.
Thammasat University · THThammasat University Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood donations are essential to the blood supply available for patients in life-saving treatments. We aimed to identify characteristics affecting repeat donations, and to model a tool to forecast repeat donation among Thammasat University Hospital (TUH) donors. A retrospective study for 4 years of donations at TUH was conducted to identify characteristics affecting continuous donations and model a scoring tool, as well as pilot test it, prospectively. Data concerning age, sex, ABO grouping, Rh(D) typing, and collection site were included. The outcome was dichotomized as controls and cases based on first time and repeat donations. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to obtain the cut-off, while odds ratio was used to assign the score. During the study, 37,736 donations comprised 6,305 controls and 31,431 cases. Characteristics that positively predicted repeat donation included male, age ≥ 30 years, AB blood group and on-site donation, and they were chosen to model the score. The total score value of 3 was chosen as the rounded cut-off. A pilot study, the score was observed to have an accuracy of 67.5%. In conclusion, 4 significant characteristics appeared to positively influence repeat donation. The predictive scoring model is a simple reliable and valid tool exhibiting good accuracy.

Indexed as

Blood donationFirst time donationPredictive score modelRepeat donation

Identifiers

PMID36699423
PMCPMC9868194
OpenAlexW4289779303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.