Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699394›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2022

Biological network topology features predict gene dependencies in cancer cell-lines.

Graeme Benstead-Hume, Sarah K Wooller, Joanna Renaut, Samantha Dias, Lisa Woodbine, Antony M Carr, Frances M G Pearl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Graeme Benstead-HumeBioinformatics Lab, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK.
Sarah K WoollerBioinformatics Lab, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK.
Joanna RenautBioinformatics Lab, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK.
Samantha DiasGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
Lisa WoodbineGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
Antony M CarrGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
Frances M G PearlBioinformatics Lab, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8210-4393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks have been shown to successfully predict essential proteins. However, such networks are derived generically from experiments on many thousands of different cells. Consequently, conventional PPI networks cannot capture the variation of genetic dependencies that exists across different cell types, let alone those that emerge as a result of the massive cell restructuring that occurs during carcinogenesis. Predicting cell-specific dependencies is of considerable therapeutic benefit, facilitating the use of drugs to inhibit those proteins on which the cancer cells have become specifically dependent. In order to go beyond the limitations of the generic PPI, we have attempted to personalise PPI networks to reflect cell-specific patterns of gene expression and mutation. By using 12 topological features of the resulting PPIs, together with matched gene dependency data from DepMap, we trained random-forest classifiers (DependANT) to predict novel gene dependencies. Results: We found that DependANT improves the power of the baseline generic PPI models in predicting common gene dependencies, by up to 10.8% and is more sensitive than the baseline generic model when predicting genes on which only a small number of cell types are dependent. Availability and implementation: Software available at https://bitbucket.org/bioinformatics_lab_sussex/dependant2. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at

Identifiers

PMID36699394
PMCPMC9681200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.