ArticleBioinformatics advances2022
MarkerGenie: an NLP-enabled text-mining system for biomedical entity relation extraction.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence and multi-omics integration in liquid biopsy for genitourinary cancers: a systematic scoping review.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- MINERVA-microbiome network research and visualization atlas: a scalable knowledge graph for mapping microbiome-disease associations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- PuMA: PubMed gene/cell type-relation Atlas.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Bridging artificial intelligence and biological sciences: a comprehensive review of large language models in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Current Bioinformatics Tools in Precision Oncology.MedComm · 2025Review
- A natural language processing system for the efficient extraction of cell markers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Investigating Cross-Domain Binary Relation Classification in Biomedical Natural Language Processing.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Natural language processing (NLP) tasks aim to convert unstructured text data (e.g. articles or dialogues) to structured information. In recent years, we have witnessed fundamental advances of NLP technique, which has been widely used in many applications such as financial text mining, news recommendation and machine translation. However, its application in the biomedical space remains challenging due to a lack of labeled data, ambiguities and inconsistencies of biological terminology. In biomedical marker discovery studies, tools that rely on NLP models to automatically and accurately extract relations of biomedical entities are valuable as they can provide a more thorough survey of all available literature, hence providing a less biased result compared to manual curation. In addition, the fast speed of machine reader helps quickly orient research and development. Results: To address the aforementioned needs, we developed automatic training data labeling, rule-based biological terminology cleaning and a more accurate NLP model for binary associative and multi-relation prediction into the Availability and implementation: MarkerGenie is available at https://www.genegeniedx.com/markergenie/. Data for model training and evaluation, term lists of biomedical entities, details of the case studies and all trained models are provided at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/14RypiIfIr3W_K-mNIAx9BNtObHSZoAyn?usp=sharing. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.