Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699373›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2022

The network makeup artist (NORMA-2.0): distinguishing annotated groups in a network using innovative layout strategies.

Evangelos Karatzas, Mikaela Koutrouli, Fotis A Baltoumas, Katerina Papanikolopoulou, Costas Bouyioukos, Georgios A Pavlopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Visualizing metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data: A comprehensive review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Arena3DNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evangelos KaratzasInstitute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center "Alexander Fleming", Vari, 16672, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-8981
Mikaela KoutrouliNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fotis A BaltoumasInstitute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center "Alexander Fleming", Vari, 16672, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-2931
Katerina PapanikolopoulouEpigenetics and Cell Fate, CNRS UMR7216, Université Paris Cité, F-75013 Paris, France.
Costas BouyioukosEpigenetics and Cell Fate, CNRS UMR7216, Université Paris Cité, F-75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7443-3736
Georgios A PavlopoulosInstitute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center "Alexander Fleming", Vari, 16672, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-8276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Network biology is a dominant player in today's multi-omics era. Therefore, the need for visualization tools which can efficiently cope with intra-network heterogeneity emerges. Results: NORMA-2.0 is a web application which uses efficient layouts to group together areas of interest in a network. In this version, NORMA-2.0 utilizes three different strategies to make such groupings as distinct as possible while it preserves all of the properties from its first version where one can handle multiple networks and annotation files simultaneously. Availability and implementation: The web resource is available at http://norma.pavlopouloslab.info/. The source code is freely available at https://github.com/PavlopoulosLab/NORMA.

Identifiers

PMID36699373
PMCPMC9710664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.