Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699351›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2022

MUNDO: protein function prediction embedded in a multispecies world.

Victor Arsenescu, Kapil Devkota, Mert Erden, Polina Shpilker, Matthew Werenski, Lenore J Cowen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor ArsenescuDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Kapil DevkotaDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Mert ErdenDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Polina ShpilkerDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Matthew WerenskiDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-9893
Lenore J CowenDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-6413
Tufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Leveraging cross-species information in protein function prediction can add significant power to network-based protein function prediction methods, because so much functional information is conserved across at least close scales of evolution. We introduce MUNDO, a new cross-species co-embedding method that combines a single-network embedding method with a co-embedding method to predict functional annotations in a target species, leveraging also functional annotations in a model species network. Results: Across a wide range of parameter choices, MUNDO performs best at predicting annotations in the mouse network, when trained on mouse and human protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, in the human network, when trained on human and mouse PPIs, and in Baker's yeast, when trained on Fission and Baker's yeast, as compared to competitor methods. MUNDO also outperforms all the cross-species methods when predicting in Fission yeast when trained on Fission and Baker's yeast; however, in this single case, discarding the information from the other species and using annotations from the Fission yeast network alone usually performs best. Availability and implementation: All code is available and can be accessed here: github.com/v0rtex20k/MUNDO. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at

Identifiers

PMID36699351
PMCPMC9710620
OpenAlexW3202565939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.