ArticleActa endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)
THE LEARNING CURVE AND PERFORMANCE OF A NEWLY ESTABLISHED THYROID FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION CENTER.
Article in Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is the best tool for preoperative diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma; however, its learning curve is poorly described. Our aim was to assess the learning curve of a new thyroid FNA center involving unexperienced operator and pathologist. Methods: We retrieved from our tertiary endocrinology center database all thyroid FNA procedures done by a single operator (endocrinologist with no experience in FNA) between 2018 and 2021. Cytology was assessed by two pathologists with limited or no experience in thyroid cytology. We also got the corresponding sex, age, nodule diameter, EU-TIRADS score, Bethesda category and final pathology report. Results: There were 1872 FNA in 1618 patients. Proportion of Bethesda 1 nodules decreased significantly (p for trend=0.003) from 17% in the first 100 FNA procedures to 4% in the 401-500 group of procedures, and remained constant between 9% and 4% (p for trend=NS) for the rest of the study. Proportion of Bethesda 2 rose steady from 26% in the first 100 nodules to 80.1% in the last 241 nodules (p for trend<0.001). Indeterminate lesions (Bethesda 3 and 4) decreased significantly (p for trend=0.001) from 16% and 35% in the first 100 nodules to 2.5% and 5.8% in the last 241 lesions. Proportions of Bethesda 5+6 categories varied non-significantly over time. There were no time trends in the malignancy rate of surgically removed nodules. Conclusions: At least 300 procedures are needed to reach the standard performance. A steadily state for the whole center is obtained after about 500 procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.