Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699145›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2022

Introduction and integration of PrEP and sexual and reproductive health services for young people: Health provider perspectives from South Africa.

Melanie Pleaner, Fiona Scorgie, Catherine Martin, Vusile Butler, Lorrein Muhwava, Maserame Mojapele, Saiqa Mullick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PrEP and choice counselling - Insights into implementation.Journal of public health in Africa · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie PleanerWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Fiona ScorgieWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Catherine MartinWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Vusile ButlerWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lorrein MuhwavaWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Maserame MojapeleWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Saiqa MullickWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

South Africa has one of the largest HIV epidemics in the world, with particularly high prevalence among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). Oral PrEP was introduced in the public sector in 2016 in a phased manner. Given the important role played by health providers, research was undertaken to understand their experiences of and attitudes towards introduction of PrEP as a new HIV prevention method, and its integration within broader sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services for youth. A survey was undertaken with 48 purposively sampled health providers working in primary health care facilities and mobile clinics in three provinces in South Africa. Qualitative analysis was performed on free-text responses to open-ended questions in the survey, using an inductive approach to code the data in NVivo v.12 software. Health providers expressed concerns about adding a new service to an already overburdened health system, and worried that young people seeking PrEP would divert staff from other critical services. While most recognised the benefits and opportunities afforded by HIV and SRH service integration, providers highlighted the extra time and resources such integration would require. Many were anxious that PrEP would encourage disinhibition and increase unprotected sex among AGYW, and held judgemental attitudes about young people, seen as largely incapable of taking responsibility for their health. Findings underscore the importance of consulting health providers about implementation design and providing channels for them to express their misgivings and concerns, and training needs to be designed to address provider attitudes and values. Opportunities need to be sought to strengthen the provision of adolescent and youth friendly services-including adolescent-health provider dialogues. Insights from this study can assist in guiding the introduction of new HIV prevention methods into the future.

Indexed as

adolescent girlshealth providershealth systemsHIV preventionintegrationoral PrEPsexual and reproductive health (SRH)young women (AGYW)

Identifiers

PMID36699145
PMCPMC9869154
OpenAlexW4315490592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.