Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699100›Full record

ArticleMedicine international

Rt-PA thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute posterior circulation stroke: A retrospective study.

Yaozhi Hu, Haifei Zheng, Xiaohui Chen, Zongen Gao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaozhi HuDepartment of Neurology, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, Shandong 257000, P.R. China.
Haifei ZhengDepartment of International Special Needs Medicine, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, Shandong 257000, P.R. China.
Xiaohui ChenDepartment of Neurology, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, Shandong 257000, P.R. China.
Zongen GaoDepartment of Neurology, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, Shandong 257000, P.R. China.
Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) thrombolytic therapy is widely used in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h following stroke onset. However, the efficacy of intravenous alteplase thrombolytic therapy for posterior circulation stroke (PCS) has been rarely described. The present study aimed to predict the outcome of patients with PCS following rt-PA thrombolytic therapy in a more efficient manner. Data were collected from patients who had suffered from posterior circulation ischemic stroke, who had been treated with rt-PA over a period of 4 years (2016-2020), and had been treated at a stroke center. All patients were treated with alteplase at a standard dose of 0.9 mg/kg. According to the onset to needle time (ONT), these patients were divided into the 0-3 and 3-4.5 h groups, and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was compared before thrombolysis and at 24 h after thrombolysis. Subsequently, the patients with acute PCS whose ONT was ≤3 h were divided into the NIHSS score >3 points and NIHSS score ≤3 points groups, and the NIHSS score improvement rate was compared 24 h later. A total of 989 patients were included in the study; there were 783 patients with acute anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and 203 patients with acute PCS (of note, 2 patients had negative results from brain magnetic resonance imaging); 63 patients were treated with urokinase (UK) thrombolysis and 140 patients were treated with alteplase intravenous thrombolysis. The 140 patients that received alteplase thrombolytic therapy were divided into two groups, namely the ≤3 h group and 3-4.5 h group, which, on the basis of the ONT, no significant differences were found between the two the groups according to the NIHSS score before thrombolysis (P>0.05). The NHISS scores in the ≤3 h group were significantly lower than those in the 3-4.5 h group following thrombolysis therapy, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05); the patients with acute PCS treated with rt-PA in the ≤3 h group were divided into the NIHSS score ≤3 points group and the NIHSS score >3 points group. In this ≤3 h group, the average NIHSS score improvement rate following rt-PA thrombolysis was 0.535 (53.5%) in the NIHSS score ≤3 points group and that in the NIHSS score >3 points group was 0.336 (33.6%); the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The patients treated with intravenous alteplase thrombolysis within 3 h following stroke onset benefited more than those treated with thrombolysis therapy within 3 to 4.5 h after stroke onset. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that the patients with mild stroke (NIHSS score ≤3 points) who were treated at an earlier stage (received alteplase thrombolysis therapy within 3 h after stroke onset) benefited to a greater extent from the therapy.

Indexed as

onset to needle timeposterior circulation strokeretrospective studyrt-PAthrombolytic therapy

Identifiers

PMID36699100
PMCPMC9829197
OpenAlexW4214770741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.