Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699033›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Modulating brain integrative actions as a new perspective on pharmacological approaches to neuropsychiatric diseases.

Manuela Marcoli, Luigi F Agnati, Rafael Franco, Pietro Cortelli, Deanna Anderlini, Diego Guidolin, Chiara Cervetto, Guido Maura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuela MarcoliDepartment of Pharmacy, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Luigi F AgnatiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic Sciences and Neuroscience, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Rafael FrancoCiberNed Network Center for Neurodegenerative diseases, National Spanish Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Pietro CortelliDepartment of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Deanna AnderliniCentre for Sensorimotor Performance, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Diego GuidolinDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Chiara CervettoDepartment of Pharmacy, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Guido MauraDepartment of Pharmacy, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical aspect of drug development in the therapy of neuropsychiatric diseases is the "Target Problem", that is, the selection of a proper target after not simply the etiopathological classification but rather the detection of the supposed structural and/or functional alterations in the brain networks. There are novel ways of approaching the development of drugs capable of overcoming or at least reducing the deficits without triggering deleterious side effects. For this purpose, a model of brain network organization is needed, and the main aspects of its integrative actions must also be established. Thus, to this aim we here propose an updated model of the brain as a hyper-network in which i) the penta-partite synapses are suggested as key nodes of the brain hyper-network and ii) interacting cell surface receptors appear as both decoders of signals arriving to the network and targets of central nervous system diseases. The integrative actions of the brain networks follow the "Russian Doll organization" including the micro (i.e., synaptic) and nano (i.e., molecular) levels. In this scenario, integrative actions result primarily from protein-protein interactions. Importantly, the macromolecular complexes arising from these interactions often have novel structural binding sites of allosteric nature. Taking G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) as potential targets, GPCRs heteromers offer a way to increase the selectivity of pharmacological treatments if proper allosteric drugs are designed. This assumption is founded on the possible selectivity of allosteric interventions on G protein-coupled receptors especially when organized as "Receptor Mosaics" at penta-partite synapse level.

Indexed as

BrainReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledBinding SitesRussiaReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledallosteric modulatorsbrain connectomicsdrug targetsG-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs)neuropsychiatric disorderspenta-partite synapsereceptor heteromerizationreceptor mosaics

Identifiers

PMID36699033
PMCPMC9868467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.