Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698950›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Reciprocal interferences of the left ventricular assist device and the aortic valve competence.

Olga Vriz, Ali Mushtaq, Abdullah Shaik, Ahmed El-Shaer, Khalid Feras, Abdalla Eltayeb, Hani Alsergnai, Naji Kholaif, Mosaad Al Hussein, Dimpna Albert-Brotons and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga VrizHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali MushtaqSchool of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah ShaikSchool of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed El-ShaerSchool of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid FerasHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdalla EltayebHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hani AlsergnaiHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Naji KholaifHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mosaad Al HusseinHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dimpna Albert-BrotonsHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Andre Rudiger SimonHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Felix Wang TsaiHeart Centre Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients suffering from end-stage heart failure tend to have high mortality rates. With growing numbers of patients progressing into severe heart failure, the shortage of available donors is a growing concern, with less than 10% of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation (CTx). Fortunately, the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), a variant of mechanical circulatory support has been on the rise in recent years. The expansion of LVADs has led them to be incorporated into a variety of clinical settings, based on the goals of therapy for patients ailing from heart failure. However, with an increase in the use of LVADs, there are a host of complications that arise with it. One such complication is the development and progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) which is noted to adversely influence patient outcomes and compromise pump benefits leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial and involve the aortic root-aortic valve (AV) complex, as well as the LVAD device, patient, and other factors, all of them alter the physiological mechanics of the heart resulting in AV dysfunction. Thus, it is imperative to screen patients before LVAD implantation for AR, as moderate or greater AR requires a concurrent intervention at the time of LVADs implantation. No current strict guidelines were identified in the literature search on how to actively manage and limit the development and/or progression of AR, due to the limited information. However, some recommendations include medical management by targeting fluid overload and arterial blood pressure, along with adjusting the settings of the LVADs device itself. Surgical interventions are to be considered depending on patient factors, goals of care, and the underlying pathology. These interventions include the closure of the AV, replacement of the valve, and percutaneous approach

Indexed as

aortic regurgitationheart transplantleft ventricular assist device (LVAD)surgical interventiontranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Identifiers

PMID36698950
PMCPMC9870593
OpenAlexW4315480982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.