ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement: Techniques and early results.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Totally Endoscopic Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility and safety of totally endoscopic Bentall procedure via right anterior mini-thoracotomy: Early experience.JTCVS techniques · 2026Trial
- Single twistable tendon-driven continuum robots.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The TATEGIRI technique: adaptation of a longitudinal aortotomy for totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Double-lumen tubes verus single-lumen tube in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a randomised, controlled clinical trial.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Totally 3D endoscopic aortic valve replacement: initial results and experience from a single center.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Aortic Valve Replacement: Totally Endoscopic versus Mini-Sternotomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Totally Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement With Triangulated Suturing: How to Do It.Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate the technical details of total endoscopic aortic valve replacement using a standard prosthesis, compare the clinical effect and safety of endoscopic aortic valve replacement and traditional aortic valve replacement. Methods: From 2020 to 2021, 60 consecutive patients underwent elective isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). They were divided into two groups: the total endoscopic AVR group (TE-AVR group, 29 patients, nine women, aged 51.65 ± 11.79 years), and the traditional full-sternotomy group (AVR group, 31 patients, 13 women, aged 54.23 ± 12.06 years). Three working ports were adopted in the TE-AVR procedure. Results: No patient died in either group. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time and aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time in the TE-AVR group were longer than those in the AVR group (CPB time: 177.6 ± 43.2 vs. 112.1 ± 18.1 min, Conclusion: Total endoscopic aortic valve replacement is safe and feasible, with less trauma and quicker recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.