Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698937›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Quantitative late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance analysis of the relationship between ablation parameter and left atrial tissue lesion following pulmonary vein isolation.

Qian Wang, Bingyu Huang, Shengqi Huo, Junyi Guo, Haojie Li, Tao Jiang, Dewei Peng, Lintong Men, Dazhong Tang, Chunlin Xiang and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qian WangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Bingyu HuangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shengqi HuoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Junyi GuoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Haojie LiDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tao JiangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dewei PengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Lintong MenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dazhong TangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chunlin XiangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yi LuoDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiu PiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Lulu PengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yue JiangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Mengying ZhuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wei ShiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Sheng LiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiagao LvDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Li LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The impact of ablation parameters on acute tissue lesion formation after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has not been sufficiently evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation lesion can be visualized by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR). We sought to quantitatively analyze the relationship between ablation parameter and tissue lesion following PVI at different segments of pulmonary vein (PV) using LGE-CMR. Methods: Twenty-one patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent PVI procedure were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent LGE-CMR examination within 3 days after radiofrequency ablation. Ablation parameters during PVI were documented, including lesion size index (LSI), force-time integral (FTI), power, contact force, temperature, and time of duration. The ablation point was projected onto 3-dimensional (3D) left atrial shell constructed base on LGE-CMR and corresponding image intensity ratio (IIR) was calculated on the same shell. A tissue lesion point was defined when the LGE-CMR IIR was > 1.2. Results: In total, 1,759 ablation points were analyzed. The ablation parameters and IIRs for each PV segment were significantly different ( Conclusion: When similar ablation parameters were applied during PVI, the posterior wall of PV had more severe tissue lesion than non-posterior wall of PV. Therefore, it was reasonable to decrease ablation energy at posterior wall of PV. Moreover, LSI was a better index to reflect tissue lesion quality following PVI at non-posterior of PV.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationlate gadoliniumlesion size indexmagnetic resonance imagingpulmonary vein isolationradiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID36698937
PMCPMC9869251
OpenAlexW4315490733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.