Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698929›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Trend and early outcomes in isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in the United Kingdom.

Jeremy Chan, Arnaldo Dimagli, Daniel P Fudulu, Shubhra Sinha, Pradeep Narayan, Tim Dong, Gianni D Angelini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-term clinical outcomes in patients between the age of 50-70 years receiving biological versus mechanical aortic valve prostheses.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanical Valves: Past, Present, and Future-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy ChanBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Arnaldo DimagliBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Daniel P FuduluBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Shubhra SinhaBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Pradeep NarayanBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Tim DongBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Gianni D AngeliniBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
NIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBRabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences · IN

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1992027/7163British Heart Foundation PG/11/19/28827British Heart Foundation PG/13/9/29990British Heart Foundation PG/14/72/31080British Heart Foundation PG/15/95/31853British Heart Foundation SP/19/7/34810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is traditionally the gold-standard treatment in patients with aortic valve disease. The advancement of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) provides an alternative treatment to patients with high surgical risks and those who had previous cardiac surgery. We aim to evaluate the trend, early clinical outcomes, and the choice of prosthesis use in isolated SAVR in the United Kingdom. Methods: All patients ( Results: The number of isolated SAVR increased across the study period with an average of 4,661 cases performed annually after 2010. The in-hospital/30-day mortality rate decreased from 5.28% (1996) to 1.06% (2018), despite an increasing trend in EuroSCORE II. The number of isolated SAVR performed in octogenarians increased from 596 to 2007 (the first year when TAVR was introduced in the UK) to 872 in 2015 and then progressively decreased to 681 in 2018. Biological prosthesis usage increased across all age groups, particularly in the 60-69 group, from 24.59% (1996) to 81.87% (2018). There were no differences in short-term outcomes in patients <65 years old who received biological or mechanical prostheses. Conclusion: Surgical aortic valve replacement remains an effective treatment for patients with isolated aortic valve disease with a low in-hospital/30-day mortality rate. The number of patients with high-risk and octogenarians who underwent isolated SAVR and those requiring redo surgery has reduced since 2016, likely due to the advancement in TAVR. The use of biological aortic prostheses has increased significantly in recent years in all age groups.

Indexed as

aortic valvesurgical aortic replacementtranscatheter and surgical aortic valve replacementtrendUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID36698929
PMCPMC9868612
OpenAlexW4313889745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.