ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: Cervical internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion vs. true occlusion.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular Thrombectomy for Carotid Pseudo-Occlusion in the Setting of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Pooled it
- True versus pseudo-occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery in acute stroke: A multicenter MR angiography study.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- True versus pseudo-occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery in acute stroke: A multicenter MR angiography study.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- Biological Nanotherapeutics Derived From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Mechanisms and Translational Potential in Multisystem Therapies for Regeneration and Oncology.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Pseudo-occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (cICA) refers to an absence of intraluminal contrast on computed tomography angiography (CTA), while the artery is patent on digital subtraction angiography during endovascular thrombectomy. We aimed to compare the outcomes between the cICA pseudo-occlusion and true occlusion after thrombectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with apparent cICA occlusion on CTA who underwent thrombectomy between January 2016 and August 2021, and divided them into the pseudo-occlusion and true occlusion groups based on angiographic exploration. Recanalization failure was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 0-2a. Poor outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the outcomes. Sensitivity analysis using multivariate-adjusted regression in the original cohort was conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Results: Of the 146 patients included, 79 patients (54.1%) had cICA pseudo-occlusion and 67 patients (45.9%) had true occlusion. Following 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis, patients with pseudo-occlusion had an increased likelihood of recanalization failure (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.06-9.59; Conclusions: Patients with cICA pseudo-occlusion on CTA treated with thrombectomy had an increased risk of reperfusion failure and poor outcome compared with true occlusion patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.