Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698867›Full record

ArticleMedicine international

Structural risk analysis of a potential Ebola outbreak with respect to infrastructural aspects amid the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Mohamed Arafkas, Issideen Ayinla Osseni, Justyna Schubert, Jacek Bania, Joanna Kulas, Veria Khosrawipour, Maya Karine Labbé, Piotr Frelkiewicz, Tanja Khosrawipour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohamed ArafkasDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Petrus Hospital, D-42283 Wuppertal, Germany.
Issideen Ayinla OsseniDepartment of Medicine, UAC Health Sciences Faculty, 01 BP 526 Cotonou, Benin.
Justyna SchubertDepartment of Food Hygiene and Consumer Health Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Jacek BaniaDepartment of Food Hygiene and Consumer Health Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Joanna KulasDepartment of Food Hygiene and Consumer Health Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Veria KhosrawipourDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Petrus Hospital, D-42283 Wuppertal, Germany.
Maya Karine LabbéSchool of Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Piotr FrelkiewiczCenter of Experimental Diagnostics and Innovative Biomedical Technology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland.
Tanja KhosrawipourDepartment of Surgery (A), University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, D-40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the ease and increased volume of global interaction, it remains unclear whether the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic will be a one-off event or whether the world is at risk of recurrent pandemics as a result of globalization. To address this important issue, the present study assessed the risk of a possible future Ebola pandemic. The risk profile of Hubei province in China was compared with that of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in terms of travel and infrastructure, since DRC is considered a major epicenter for Ebola outbreaks. Recurrence patterns of previous Ebola outbreaks were analyzed in a cumulative outbreak model. Internationally available data on air traffic, flight destinations, passenger numbers, population density, distribution and domestic traffic routes were all analyzed and compared between the DRC and Hubei province. DRC is a major epicenter for Ebola outbreaks, with 13 recorded outbreaks from 1976 until 2020. International airports at both Kinshasa, the capital city of the DRC and Wuhan, the capital city of Hubei province, are heavily frequented destinations and represent major transfer hubs on their respective continents. Volumes of flights to and from extracontinental destinations account for <25% of total flights at both airports with similar total international passenger volumes. However, the volume of domestic commuting by aviation is >30-fold higher at Hubei province compared with that of the DRC. This finding is also reflected by the higher population density and homogeneity in terms of population per square kilometer in Hubei. Following the analysis of decades of Ebola reports, it became evident that the DRC remains a hotspot for potential Ebola outbreaks in the future due to constantly recurrent local outbreaks. In terms of the international aviation network, numerous important similarities between Kinshasa and Hubei Province were observed as regards connectivity. The present comparative analysis extends beyond biological factors underlying Ebola and COVID-19 transmissions and confirms that the DRC, Kinshasa in particular, is not a remote location. Although internal commuting and population density may be lower in the DRC compared with those in Hubei province, integration into the international aviation network is similarly extensive. The international community must increase its focus and efforts in preventing another possible global pandemic commencing in Africa, and in particular the DRC.

Indexed as

ChinacoronavirusCOVID-19Democratic Republic of CongoEbolapandemic

Identifiers

PMID36698867
PMCPMC9855279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.