Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698828›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Development and validation of risk-adjusted quality indicators for the long-term outcome of acute sepsis care in German hospitals based on health claims data.

Lisa Wedekind, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, Norman Rose, Melissa Spoden, Christian Günster, Peter Schlattmann, André Scherag, Konrad Reinhart, Daniel Schwarzkopf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa WedekindInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Carolin Fleischmann-StruzekInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Norman RoseInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Melissa SpodenFederal Association of the Local Health Care Funds, Research Institute of the Local Health Care Funds (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.
Christian GünsterFederal Association of the Local Health Care Funds, Research Institute of the Local Health Care Funds (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.
Peter SchlattmannInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
André ScheragInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Konrad ReinhartDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel SchwarzkopfDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods for assessing long-term outcome quality of acute care for sepsis are lacking. We investigated a method for measuring long-term outcome quality based on health claims data in Germany. Materials and methods: Analyses were based on data of the largest German health insurer, covering 32% of the population. Cases (aged 15 years and older) with ICD-10-codes for severe sepsis or septic shock according to sepsis-1-definitions hospitalized in 2014 were included. Short-term outcome was assessed by 90-day mortality; long-term outcome was assessed by a composite endpoint defined by 1-year mortality or increased dependency on chronic care. Risk factors were identified by logistic regressions with backward selection. Hierarchical generalized linear models were used to correct for clustering of cases in hospitals. Predictive validity of the models was assessed by internal validation using bootstrap-sampling. Risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMR) were calculated with and without reliability adjustment and their univariate and bivariate distributions were described. Results: Among 35,552 included patients, 53.2% died within 90 days after admission; 39.8% of 90-day survivors died within the first year or had an increased dependency on chronic care. Both risk-models showed a sufficient predictive validity regarding discrimination [ Conclusion: Quality assurance and epidemiological surveillance of sepsis care should include indicators of long-term mortality and morbidity. Claims-based risk-adjustment models for quality indicators of acute sepsis care showed satisfactory predictive validity. To increase reliability of measurement, data sources should cover the full population and hospitals need to improve ICD-10-coding of sepsis.

Indexed as

administrative claimsdiagnosis related groupshealth care quality assessmentmortalityrisk-adjustmentsepsis

Identifiers

PMID36698828
PMCPMC9868402
OpenAlexW4313825611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.