ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023
Design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial for treatment of Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of early return to drinking in surviving patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Trial
- Randomized trial of anakinra plus zinc vs. prednisone for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis.Journal of hepatology · 2024Trial
- Natural history and development of a novel composite endpoint in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis: Data from a prospective multicenter study.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Observational
- Ahead, a Novel Validated Machine Learning Model for Clinical Diagnosis of Alcohol Associated Hepatitis.Research square · 2026Article
- α-Diversity analysis of hepatic transcriptome reveals distinct pathways in alcohol-associated hepatitis.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Article
- Parental liver disease mortality is associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis.Hepatology communications · 2025Observational
- 3PM-guided innovation in treatments of severe alcohol-associated hepatitis utilizing fecal microbiota transplantation.The EPMA journal · 2024Article
- The Role of Cytokines in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Alcoholic Liver Disease.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development and evaluation of objective trial performance metrics for multisite clinical studies: Experience from the AlcHep Network.Contemporary clinical trials · 2024Article
- Advances in the management of alcohol-associated liver disease.Gastroenterology report · 2024Review
- Emergency services utilization by patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis: An analysis of national trends.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2024Article
- Improving survival in alcohol-related hepatitis: what's new?Frontline gastroenterology · 2024Review
- The role of macrophages in liver fibrosis: composition, heterogeneity, and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Mortality is high for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH). Corticosteroids are the standard of care for patients without contraindications. Recent data showed that interleukin-1β receptor antagonist anakinra attenuated inflammation and liver damage. We designed a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of anakinra compared to prednisone. Methods: Patients meeting the clinical and biochemical criteria for severe AH with MELD scores between 20 and 35 were recruited at eight clinical sites. Eligible patients enrolled in the study were randomized to anakinra, 100 mg subcutaneous injection for 14 days, plus zinc sulfate 220 mg for 90 days, vs. prednisone 40 mg PO daily for 30 days. Matching placebos for anakinra, zinc, and prednisone were provided to mask the treatment. Participants were followed for 180 days. The primary outcome was overall survival at 90 days. An unadjusted log-rank test was used to compare the survival of the two treatments in the first 90 days. Between July 10, 2020, and March 4, 2022, we screened 1082 patients with severe AH, and 147 eligible patients were enrolled and randomized. The average baseline MELD score was 25 [range 20-35], Maddrey discriminant function (MDF) was 59.4 [range 20.2-197.5]. The mean aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio was 3.5. The baseline characteristics were not statistically different between the two treatment groups. Conclusions: The study provided a direct comparison of the survival benefits and safety profiles of anakinra plus zinc vs. prednisone in patients with severe AH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.