Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698705›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Determinants of vaccine acceptance, knowledge, attitude, and prevention practices against COVID-19 among governmental healthcare workers in Addis Ababa and Adama, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Aderajew M Girmay, Mesaye G Weldegebriel, Melaku G Serte, Daniel A Dinssa, Tsigereda A Alemayehu, Moa A Kenea, Abel Weldetinsae, Kirubel T Teklu, Sisay D Mengesha, Zinabu A Alemu and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aderajew M GirmayDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-4152
Mesaye G WeldegebrielDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Melaku G SerteDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Daniel A DinssaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Tsigereda A AlemayehuDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Moa A KeneaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Abel WeldetinsaeDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Kirubel T TekluDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Sisay D MengeshaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Zinabu A AlemuDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Belaynesh DemisieDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Bedasa WagariDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Martin R EvansLaboratory and Microbiology Consultant, Global Health Programs American Society for Microbiology Huntington New York USA.
Masresha TessemaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Getachew TolleraDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Ethiopian Public Health Institute · ETAmerican Society for Microbiology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: COVID-19 vaccines are vital tools for infection prevention and control of the pandemic. However, coronavirus immunization requires acceptance among healthcare workforces and by the community. In Ethiopia, studies focused on determinants of vaccine acceptance, knowledge, attitude, and prevention practices (KAP) contrary to the novel coronavirus among healthcare staff are limited. Hence, closing this gap requires research. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 844 governmental healthcare workers. A stratified, simple random sampling technique was used to select the respondents. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Binary and multivariable logistic regression statistical models were used to analyze the data. Results: This study indicated that only 57.9% of the participants had good COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, meaning they took at least a dose of the vaccine themselves. We found that 65%, 60.9%, and 51.3% of the participants had good knowledge, prevention practices, and attitude against the pandemic. The novel coronavirus vaccine acceptance rate was 2.19 times more likely among females (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.19 with 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-3.10) than among male participants. Further, respondents who did not report having any chronic diseases were 9.40 times higher to accept COVID-19 vaccines (AOR = 9.40 with 95% CI: 4.77, 18.53) than those who reported having a chronic condition. However, healthcare workers who had a habit of chewing khat at least once per week were 4% less likely to take the vaccine (AOR = 0.04 with 95% CI: 0.01, 0.32) than those who had no habit of chewing khat. Conclusion: Many core factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance were identified. A significant number of participants had poor vaccine acceptance, KAP against COVID-19. Therefore, the government should adopt urgent and effective public health measures, including public campaigns to enhance public trust in COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, continuous, timely, and practical training should be provided to healthcare workers.

Indexed as

control strategiesCOVID‐19healthcare staffimmunizationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36698705
PMCPMC9846116
OpenAlexW4318164967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.