Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698683›Full record

ReviewMedicine international

Intracranial post-clipping residual or recurrent aneurysms: Current status and treatment options (Review).

Jianmin Piao, Tengfei Luan, Lai Qu, Jinlu Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianmin PiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
Tengfei LuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
Lai QuDepartment of Intensive Care, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
Jinlu YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
First Hospital of Jilin University · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the clipping of intracranial aneurysms, post-clipping residual or recurrent aneurysms (PCRRAs) can occur. In recent years, the incidence of PCRRAs has increased due to a prolonged follow-up period and advanced imaging techniques. However, several aspects of intracranial PCRRAs remain unclear. Therefore, the present study performed an in-depth review of the literature on PCRRAs. Herein, a summary of PCRRAs that can be divided into the following two categories is presented: i) Those occurring after the incomplete clipping of an aneurysm, where the residual aneurysm regrows into a PCRRA; and ii) those occurring after the complete clipping of an aneurysm, in which a

Indexed as

endovascular treatmentpost-clipping residual or recurrent aneurysmssurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID36698683
PMCPMC9855273
OpenAlexW3156753924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.