Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698680›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2023

Numerical approach to quantify depth-dependent blood flow changes in real-time using the diffusion equation with continuous-wave and time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy.

Michael Helton, Suraj Rajasekhar, Samantha Zerafa, Karthik Vishwanath, Mary-Ann Mycek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael HeltonApplied Physics Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-9973
Suraj RajasekharCell, Molecular and Structural Biology Program, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
Samantha ZerafaBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Karthik VishwanathCell, Molecular and Structural Biology Program, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-5492
Mary-Ann MycekApplied Physics Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is a non-invasive optical technique that can measure brain perfusion by quantifying temporal intensity fluctuations of multiply scattered light. A primary limitation for accurate quantitation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is the fact that experimental measurements contain information about both extracerebral scalp blood flow (SBF) as well as CBF. Separating CBF from SBF is typically achieved using multiple source-detector channels when using continuous-wave (CW) light sources, or more recently with use of time-domain (TD) techniques. Analysis methods that account for these partial volume effects are often employed to increase CBF contrast. However, a robust, real-time analysis procedure that can separate and quantify SBF and CBF with both traditional CW and TD-DCS measurements is still needed. Here, we validate a data analysis procedure based on the diffusion equation in layered media capable of quantifying both extra- and cerebral blood flow in the CW and TD. We find that the model can quantify SBF and CBF coefficients with less than 5% error compared to Monte Carlo simulations using a 3-layered brain model in both the CW and TD. The model can accurately fit data at a rate of <10 ms for CW data and <250 ms for TD data when using a least-squares optimizer.

Identifiers

PMID36698680
PMCPMC9841990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.