ArticleBiomedical optics express2023
Numerical approach to quantify depth-dependent blood flow changes in real-time using the diffusion equation with continuous-wave and time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monte Carlo simulations of time-resolved blood flow index: times-of-flight beyond ∼1 ns are necessary for brain-dominated measurements.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Approaches for modelling autocorrelation function and data processing in time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Fast blood flow index reconstruction of diffuse correlation spectroscopy using a back-propagation-free data-driven algorithm.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- scatterBrains: an open database of human head models and companion optode locations for realistic Monte Carlo photon simulations.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Introduction to the Biophotonics Congress 2022 feature issue.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is a non-invasive optical technique that can measure brain perfusion by quantifying temporal intensity fluctuations of multiply scattered light. A primary limitation for accurate quantitation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is the fact that experimental measurements contain information about both extracerebral scalp blood flow (SBF) as well as CBF. Separating CBF from SBF is typically achieved using multiple source-detector channels when using continuous-wave (CW) light sources, or more recently with use of time-domain (TD) techniques. Analysis methods that account for these partial volume effects are often employed to increase CBF contrast. However, a robust, real-time analysis procedure that can separate and quantify SBF and CBF with both traditional CW and TD-DCS measurements is still needed. Here, we validate a data analysis procedure based on the diffusion equation in layered media capable of quantifying both extra- and cerebral blood flow in the CW and TD. We find that the model can quantify SBF and CBF coefficients with less than 5% error compared to Monte Carlo simulations using a 3-layered brain model in both the CW and TD. The model can accurately fit data at a rate of <10 ms for CW data and <250 ms for TD data when using a least-squares optimizer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.