Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698671›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2023

Corneal endothelium assessment in specular microscopy images with Fuchs' dystrophy via deep regression of signed distance maps.

Juan S Sierra, Jesus Pineda, Daniela Rueda, Alejandro Tello, Angélica M Prada, Virgilio Galvis, Giovanni Volpe, Maria S Millan, Lenny A Romero, Andres G Marrugo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Juan S SierraFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, Cartagena, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-0421
Jesus PinedaDepartment of Physics, University of Gothenburg, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Daniela RuedaHospital Oftalmológico Dr. Elías Santana en Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Alejandro TelloCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia.
Angélica M PradaCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia.
Virgilio GalvisCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia.
Giovanni VolpeDepartment of Physics, University of Gothenburg, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-1846
Maria S MillanDept. Óptica y Optometría, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Terrassa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-2373
Lenny A RomeroFacultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, Cartagena, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-1077
Andres G MarrugoFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, Cartagena, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-7645
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar · COUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga · COUniversity of Gothenburg · SEIndustrial University of Santander · COInstituto Dermatológico y Cirugía de Piel "Dr. Huberto Bogaert Díaz" · DOPolytechnic University of Puerto Rico · PR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specular microscopy assessment of the human corneal endothelium (CE) in Fuchs' dystrophy is challenging due to the presence of dark image regions called guttae. This paper proposes a UNet-based segmentation approach that requires minimal post-processing and achieves reliable CE morphometric assessment and guttae identification across all degrees of Fuchs' dystrophy. We cast the segmentation problem as a regression task of the cell and gutta signed distance maps instead of a pixel-level classification task as typically done with UNets. Compared to the conventional UNet classification approach, the distance-map regression approach converges faster in clinically relevant parameters. It also produces morphometric parameters that agree with the manually-segmented ground-truth data, namely the average cell density difference of -41.9 cells/mm

Identifiers

PMID36698671
PMCPMC9842012
OpenAlexW4312111936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.