Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698620›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2023

Examining the Diagnosis and Treatment Experiences of People Living With Autoimmune Gastritis and Pernicious Anemia.

Martine Cotton, Andrew McCaddon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Vitamin BBMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martine CottonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-0936
Andrew McCaddonFaculty of Social and Life Sciences, Wrexham Glyndwr University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-9061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited research evaluating the diagnosis and treatment of patients with autoimmune gastritis (AIG) and pernicious anemia (PA). We used a 2-phase data collection process to examine the literature and individual patient accounts. Phase one comprised a systematically conducted literature review focusing on diagnosis and treatment, relationships with healthcare practitioners and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Phase two involved analysis of individual accounts via posts in online patient forums. We identified 6 main themes: the diagnosis journey, seeking treatment, patient-provider relationships, HRQOL, patient disempowerment, and the "expert patient." Our findings confirm significant knowledge gaps concerning AIG/PA across the healthcare community. These have a cascading effect starting with delays in diagnosis and poor treatment protocols and often lead to complete withdrawal from care seeking. The establishment of standard consensus guidelines and improved clinical awareness should be urgently addressed. Interventions that better help patients understand their illness are also needed to improve psychological health. Without these changes disengagement from health systems, and poor health outcomes, will continue for this population group.

Indexed as

autoimmune atrophic gastritisautoimmune gastritispatient journeyspernicious anemia

Identifiers

PMID36698620
PMCPMC9869222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.