Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698509›Full record

ArticleJournal of hematology oncology pharmacy2022

Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacy Services for Phase 1 Clinical Trials.

Jacqueline Saunders, Sumati Murli, Michelle A Rudek, Anand Khandoobhai, Anne DeLisa, Amy Goodrich, Janet Mighty

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hematology oncology pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacqueline SaundersOncology Investigational Drug Service, Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Sumati MurliClinical Research Administration.
Michelle A RudekProfessor of Oncology and Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology) and Director, Analytical Pharmacology Shared Resource, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
Anand KhandoobhaiWeinberg Oncology Pharmacy.
Anne DeLisaOncology Investigational Drug Service, Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital.
Amy GoodrichSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
Janet MightyInvestigational Drug Service, Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital.
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
QAQC Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR003098 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2019 to 2023
$57.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003098NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhase 1 clinical trials have challenges relative to later-phase clinical trials. As of April 2020, there were 71 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials at the Johns Hopkins Medicine Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (SKCCC), and limited clinical pharmacy services are dedicated to the unique needs of phase 1 clinical trials.

objectivesTo characterize the current phase 1 cancer-specific clinical pharmacy services at National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated institutions, and to develop a framework for the implementation of these services at Johns Hopkins Medicine SKCCC.

methodsWe queried the current pharmacy practices for phase 1 cancer clinical trials at NCI-designated institutions through an e-mailed 20-question national online survey to 208 pharmacists. The recipients were asked to rate how often specific pharmacy services were performed, using a 4-point Likert scale of rarely/never (<10%), sometimes (10%-49%), often (50%-80%), or almost always (>80%). The services were grouped into pretrial implementation support, phase 1 trial implementation support, medication profile review, medication therapy management, and miscellaneous support. Using the survey results, a framework for phase 1 trial clinical pharmacy services was developed concurrently to prioritize protocol complexity, monitoring requirements, and clinical pharmacy interventions.

resultsOf the 208 surveys e-mailed, 45 recipients responded, for an overall survey response rate of 22%. The responses were divided into 2 subgroups for the institutions that currently conduct phase 1 cancer clinical trials, including institutions with >40 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials and institutions with ≤40 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials. The institutions with >40 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials were more likely to have pharmacists involved with direct participant care (47% vs 18.8%, respectively) and document medication lists for phase 1 trial participants (41% vs 18.8%, respectively) than institutions with ≤40 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials. The survey results assisted in developing a framework to classify drug regimens as platinum level (ie, higher complexity) or standard level (ie, lower or average complexity) to prioritize clinical pharmacy services based on their complexity level.

conclusionOur analysis of current phase 1 clinical trial pharmacy practices at NCI institutions enabled the development of a framework for increased collaboration with research teams and phase 1 clinical trial-specific clinical pharmacy services within Johns Hopkins Medicine SKCCC.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacy servicesinvestigational drugInvestigational Drug Service pharmacistsNCI-designated centersonline surveyphase 1 cancer clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID36698509
PMCPMC9873238
OpenAlexW4318167062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.