ArticleMedicine international
Segmental citrate anticoagulation for double-filtration plasmapheresis: A case report and literature review.
Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of Citrate Anticoagulation in Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: A Clinical Study.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been widely used in patients with high-risk bleeding for anticoagulation in renal replacement therapy. However, scientific reports on the use of RCA in double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) are limited. In the available reports, anticoagulation was not performed in the plasma component separator. However, as demonstrated in the present study, during the treatment of a patient with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, although RCA was used for DFPP, coagulation occurred in the plasma component separator, resulting in the interruption of treatment. Thus, segmental citrate anticoagulation (SCA) was used and the filter was successfully prevented from clotting again. The present study demonstrates that SCA can more effectively prevent the clogging of the plasma separator and the plasma component separator, thereby maintaining the continuity of treatment and avoiding treatment interruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.