Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698445›Full record

ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023

Subcision for Atrophic Acne Scarring: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Instruments and Combinatorial Treatments.

Abhinav Vempati, Crystal Zhou, Curtis Tam, Jeffrey Khong, Aaron Rubanowitz, Kevin Tam, Sarah Hazany, Ruslan Vasilev, Salar Hazany

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of the combination of topical phenytoin and microneedling with microneedling alone in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A controlled blinded randomized clinical trial.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Beyond the Surface: A Deeper Look at the Psychosocial Impacts of Acne Scarring.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abhinav VempatiScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2537-0214
Crystal ZhouScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-2904
Curtis TamScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4504-2442
Jeffrey KhongJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7342-1581
Aaron RubanowitzGeisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA.
Kevin TamScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-8738
Sarah HazanyScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ruslan VasilevScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5735-0111
Salar HazanyScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subcutaneous incisionless surgery, also known as subcision, is a minimally invasive procedure that is commonly indicated for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. In recent years, many new techniques have been developed to maximize results from this procedure. This review article aims to identify an updated list of instruments and combinatorial treatments available for atrophic acne scar patients undergoing subcision. We constructed a comprehensive PubMed search term and performed triple-blinded screening on all resulting studies for mentions of subcision as indicated by acne scarring. Our results show that there are four main categories of subcision tools that are commonly employed to treat atrophic acne scars: needles, cannulas, wires, and blunt-blade instruments. Usage of these devices varies by scar depth, personal preference, and combinatorial treatment options. Overall, subcision is a particularly effective treatment for atrophic acne scars, and there is vast potential for further innovation with this technique.

Indexed as

acne scarCROSSdepressed scarssubcutaneous incisionless surgeryTaylor liberator

Identifiers

PMID36698445
PMCPMC9868281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.