ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Prescribing for Otitis Media in a Pediatric Emergency Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media: has watchful waiting gone with the diagnosis?CJEM · 2026Article
- Cost to implement an outpatient stewardship intervention for acute otitis media (AOM).Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Interventions to Minimize Unnecessary Antibiotic Use for Acute Otitis Media: A Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- New insights into the treatment of acute otitis media.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2023Review
- Improving Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Use for Acute Otitis Media in a Pediatric Primary Care Network.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute otitis media (AOM) is a commonly overtreated pediatric diagnosis. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends shorter antibiotic courses and wait-and-see prescriptions (WSPs) for healthy children with mild-to-moderate AOM. Still, clinicians do not consistently prescribe these in pediatric emergency units (EUs). Methods: We performed a quality improvement project to improve antibiotic prescribing in a tertiary pediatric EU over 16 months, focusing on shorter prescription durations and WSPs. We assessed AOM management via chart review, then implemented interventions, including clinician education, a guideline card, visual reminders, and updated emails. In addition, we contacted a percentage of families after their visit to assess their child's outcome and parental satisfaction. Results: Our baseline data showed that only 39% of patients prescribed antibiotics were prescribed an appropriate duration based on age and estimated AOM severity, and only 3% were prescribed WSPs. Via 2 plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, we increased the percentage of patients who received appropriate antibiotics to an average of 67%, sustained for >6 months. Follow-up phone calls suggested no difference in satisfaction or need for nonroutine follow-up care based on prescription length. We did not see a substantial increase in WSPs. Conclusions: AOM management in our children's hospital's EU was often inconsistent with AAP guidelines. Two PDSA cycles improved the rate of appropriate duration antibiotics, and follow-up phone calls suggested no difference in satisfaction or need for nonroutine follow-up care based on prescription length. The next steps involve developing an order set and implementing individualized feedback.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.