ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Toxic epidermal necrosis associated with afatinib: A case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dermatologic Adverse Events Following Afatinib in a Woman with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To report a case of afatinib-induced toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN), in a patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compare these findings with that of evaluate similarities and differences to other cases reported in the literature. Methods: With use of the algorithm of drug causality for epidermal necrolysis (ALDEN), the effects of afatinib were evaluated in a NSCLC patient who developed TEN. In addition, previous case reports on this topic were included to provide a review of patients' clinical characteristics, treatment regimens and therapy outcomes in response to afatinib treatment. Results: In our case, toxic epidermal necrolysis was observed at five days after afatinib therapy, while other Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis responses, as associated with afatinib, did not seem to be induced until a latency period of over thirty days post-afatinib. Treatment with corticosteroids resulted in significant improvements of these clinical symptoms, and eventually to a complete remission. Conclusion: Afatinib can result in grade four cutaneous adverse effects like SJS/TEN, with an uncertain latency period. The skin lesions which appear during this period of afatinib treatment should be closely monitored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.