ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Conditional survival analysis and real-time prognosis prediction for cervical cancer patients below the age of 65 years.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Imaging-Based AI for Predicting Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning-driven conditional survival prediction model for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Risk-dependent conditional survival analysis and annual hazard rate of primary ocular adnexal lymphoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive conditional survival analysis of pancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma: chemotherapy's role and predictive model development using the SEER database.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Dynamic conditional survival nomogram for primary hepatocellular carcinoma: a population-based analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Individualized estimation of conditional survival for patients with spinal chordoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Dynamic survival outcomes of the tall-cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma patients after surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Conditional survival estimates for ependymomas reveal the dynamic nature of prognostication.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Conditional survival analysis and dynamic prediction of long-term survival in Merkel cell carcinoma patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Conditional survival of patients with primary bone lymphoma of the spine: how survival changes after initial diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Survival prediction for cervical cancer is usually based on its stage at diagnosis or a multivariate nomogram. However, few studies cared whether long-term survival improved after they survived for several years. Meanwhile, traditional survival analysis could not calculate this dynamic outcome. We aimed to assess the improvement of survival over time using conditional survival (CS) analysis and developed a novel conditional survival nomogram (CS-nomogram) to provide individualized and real-time prognostic information. Methods: Cervical cancer patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and calculated the conditional CSS (C-CSS) at year y+x after giving x years of survival based on the formula C-CSS(y|x) =CSS(y+x)/CSS(x). y indicated the number of years of further survival under the condition that the patient was determined to have survived for x years. The study identified predictors by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and used multivariate Cox regression to demonstrate these predictors' effect on CSS and to develop a nomogram. Finally, the CSS possibilities predicted by the nomogram were brought into the C-CSS formula to create the CS-nomogram. Results: A total of 18,511 patients aged <65 years with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2019 were included in this study. CS analysis revealed that the 15-year CSS increased year by year from the initial 72.6% to 77.8%, 84.5%, 88.8%, 91.5%, 93.5%, 94.8%, 95.7%, 96.4%, 97.3%, 98.0%, 98.5%, 99.1%, and 99.4% (after surviving for 1-13 years, respectively), and found that when survival exceeded 5-6 years, the risk of death from cervical cancer would be less than 5% in 10-15 years. The CS-nomogram constructed using tumor size, lymph node status, distant metastasis status, and histological grade showed strong predictive performance with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.805 and a stable area under the curve (AUC) between 0.795 and 0.816 over 15 years. Conclusions: CS analysis in this study revealed the gradual improvement of CSS over time in long-term survived cervical cancer patients. We applied CS to the nomogram and developed a CS-nomogram successfully predicting individualized and real-time prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.