Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698379›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in allergy2022

Towards an FDA-cleared basophil activation test.

Oral Alpan, Richard L Wasserman, Theodore Kim, Amy Darter, Atul Shah, Douglas Jones, Donald McNeil, Henry Li, Laura Ispas, Melinda Rathkopf and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Oral AlpanAmerimmune, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Richard L WassermanMedical City Children's Hospital, Dallas, TX, United States.
Theodore KimAllergy Partners of Northern Virginia, Chantilly, VA, United States.
Amy DarterOklahoma Institute of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Atul ShahNew York Food Allergy and Wellness Center, Centereach, NY, United States.
Douglas JonesTanner Clinic, Layton, UT, United States.
Donald McNeilOptiMed, Columbus, OH, United States.
Henry LiInstitute for Asthma and Allergy, Wheaton, MD, United States.
Laura IspasAllergy, Asthma and Immunology Institute, Leesburg, VA, United States.
Melinda RathkopfAllergy Asthma and Immunology Center of Alaska, Anchorage, AK, United States.
Elena PerezAllergy Associates of the Palm Beaches, Palm Beach, FL, United States.
Dareen SiriMidwest Allergy Sinus Asthma, Normal, IL, United States.
Maeve O'ConnorAllergy, Asthma and Immunology Relief of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.
Matthew PlassmeyerAmerimmune, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Kimberly RomitoAmerimmune, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Christina PettiboneAmerimmune, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Sean O'ReillyNew Columbia Capital, LLC, Arlington, VA, United States.
Søren Ulrik SønderAmerimmune, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Gerald MartiAmerimmune, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Alaska Neurology Center · USAllergy Associates of the Palm Beaches · USAllergy Asthma Research Institute · USAsthma and Allergy Specialists · USCapital University · USInstitute for Asthma and Allergy · USMedical City Children's Hospital · USTanner Research (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food allergy is a global health problem affecting up to 10% of the world population. Accurate diagnosis of food allergies, however, is still a major challenge in medical offices and for patients seeking alternative avenues of diagnosis. A flawless test to confirm or rule out a food allergy does not exist. The lack of optimum testing methods to establish precise clinical correlations remains a major obstacle to effective treatment. Certain IgE measurement methods, including component testing, have received FDA clearance, but they have been used primarily as an analytical tool and not to establish clinical correlations. Most allergy tests are still carried out within the laboratory, and skin tests outside a laboratory setting that are used for food allergy diagnosis rely on non-standardized allergens, according to the FDA definition. Epitope mapping and basophil activation test (BAT) have recently been proposed as a means of establishing better clinical correlations. Yet neither have received FDA clearance for widespread distribution. Of the two methods, the BAT has the advantage of being a functional assay. Over the past few years, several large private practice groups in the United States, have developed BAT as a clinical assay and have started using it in patient care. Given this clinical experience, the vast number of papers published on BAT (more than 1,400 as of 2022) and the trend toward increasing FDA regulation, it is essential to understand the roadmap for regulatory clearance of this assay.

Indexed as

basophil activation testfood allergyfood and drug administrationlaboratory developed testpeanut allergy

Identifiers

PMID36698379
PMCPMC9869275
OpenAlexW4315478812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.