Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698246›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Factors affecting the critical appraisal of research articles in Evidence-Based practices by advanced practice nurses: A descriptive qualitative study.

Ai Tomotaki, Ikuko Sakai, Hiroki Fukahori, Yasunobu Tsuda, Akemi Okumura-Hiroshige

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ai TomotakiFaculty of Nursing, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8891-7950
Ikuko SakaiDepartment of Nursing Systems Management, Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1715-0331
Hiroki FukahoriFaculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6589-2607
Yasunobu TsudaSt. Marianna University Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6281-3491
Akemi Okumura-HiroshigeDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6584-4739
Chiba University · JPKeio University Shonan Fujisawa · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPTokai University · JPTokyo Metropolitan University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe factors affecting critical appraisal of research articles in evidence-based practice by certified nurse specialists who were advanced practice nurses in Japan.

designA descriptive qualitative study.

methodsFourteen certified nurse specialists with master's degree were included by a snowball sampling to maximize the variety of specialty fields for advanced practice nurses in Japan. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between November 2016 and March 2017. Interview guides included the experience of evidence-based practice and learning about critical appraisal.

resultsThe following four aspects were identified as factors affecting the critical appraisal of research articles in evidence-based practices-individual beliefs and attitude, learning status, organizational readiness and availability of research evidence. Each factor included both positive and negative aspects for critical appraisal in evidence-based practice. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: If advanced practice nurses acquire knowledge/skills of critical appraisal, they would be able to select more appropriate care. This will increase to improve the health-related outcome for patients or populations.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeNursesClinical CompetenceHumansLearningQualitative Researchadvanced practice nursescertified nurse specialistscontent analysiscritical appraisalevidence-based practiceorganizational culturequalitative researchresearch utilization

Identifiers

PMID36698246
PMCPMC10170922
OpenAlexW4318046675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.