ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023
Deep learning based identification of bone scintigraphies containing metastatic bone disease foci.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05110430 (In Silico Clinical Trial Comparing the Reading Accuracy of Doctors and a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Metastatic Bone Disease on Bone Scintigraphy Scans.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
In Silico Clinical Trial Comparing the Reading Accuracy of Doctors and a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Metastatic Bone Disease on Bone Scintigraphy Scans.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance comparison and future perspectives of deep learning and classical machine learning in bone tumor applications: a systematic review (2019-2025).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Self-reporting with checklists in artificial intelligence research on medical imaging: a systematic review based on citations of CLAIM.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Potential of Artificial Bone Scintigraphy from Early-Phase Bone Scintigraphy Using Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Impact of artificial intelligence assistance on bone scintigraphy diagnosis.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in bone Metastases: A systematic review in guideline adherence of 92 studies.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics Applied to Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Imaging: A Review.iRadiology · 2024Article
- Deep learning model using planar whole-body bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of skull base invasion in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Emerging Trends in AI and Radiomics for Bladder, Kidney, and Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Prediction of extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by CT images using an evolutionary learning model.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMetastatic bone disease (MBD) is the most common form of metastases, most frequently deriving from prostate cancer. MBD is screened with bone scintigraphy (BS), which have high sensitivity but low specificity for the diagnosis of MBD, often requiring further investigations. Deep learning (DL) - a machine learning technique designed to mimic human neuronal interactions- has shown promise in the field of medical imaging analysis for different purposes, including segmentation and classification of lesions. In this study, we aim to develop a DL algorithm that can classify areas of increased uptake on bone scintigraphy scans.
methodsWe collected 2365 BS from three European medical centres. The model was trained and validated on 1203 and 164 BS scans respectively. Furthermore we evaluated its performance on an external testing set composed of 998 BS scans. We further aimed to enhance the explainability of our developed algorithm, using activation maps. We compared the performance of our algorithm to that of 6 nuclear medicine physicians.
resultsThe developed DL based algorithm is able to detect MBD on BSs, with high specificity and sensitivity (0.80 and 0.82 respectively on the external test set), in a shorter time compared to the nuclear medicine physicians (2.5 min for AI and 30 min for nuclear medicine physicians to classify 134 BSs). Further prospective validation is required before the algorithm can be used in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.