Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698200›Full record

SynthesisHealth research policy and systems2023

Towards conceptualizing patients as partners in health systems: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis.

Meredith Vanstone, Carolyn Canfield, Cara Evans, Myles Leslie, Mary Anne Levasseur, Maggie MacNeil, Manisha Pahwa, Janelle Panday, Paula Rowland, Shipra Taneja and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health research policy and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Embedding Consumer-Led Research in a Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fostering Physician-Patient Partnerships: The Importance of Embracing the Ontological and Epistemological Understandings of Knowledge.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Review
  13. Six ways to get a grip on co-creating curriculum with patients.Canadian medical education journal · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. Meredith.vanstone@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-6259
Carolyn CanfieldPatient Advisors Network (PAN), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cara EvansHealth Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Myles LeslieSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, 906 8Th Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB, T2P1H9, Canada.
Mary Anne LevasseurPatient Advisors Network (PAN), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maggie MacNeilCentre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Manisha PahwaHealth Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Janelle PandayDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Paula RowlandWilson Centre and Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Shipra TanejaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Laura TrippDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Jeonghwa YouHealth Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Julia AbelsonCentre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 165883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the sharp increase in the involvement of patients (including family and informal caregivers) as active participants, collaborators, advisors and decision-makers in health systems, a new role has emerged: the patient partner. The role of patient partner differs from other forms of patient engagement in its longitudinal and bidirectional nature. This systematic review describes extant work on how patient partners are conceptualized and engaged in health systems. In doing so, it furthers the understanding of the role and activities of patient partners, and best practices for future patient partnership activities.

methodsA systematic review was conducted of peer-reviewed literature published in English or French that describes patient partner roles between 2000 and 2021 in any country or sector of the health system. We used a broad search strategy to capture descriptions of longitudinal patient engagement that may not have used words such as "partner" or "advisor".

resultsA total of 506 eligible papers were identified, representing patient partnership activities in mostly high-income countries. These studies overwhelmingly described patient partnership in health research. We identified clusters of literature about patient partnership in cancer and mental health. The literature is saturated with single-site descriptive studies of patient partnership on individual projects or initiatives. There is a lack of work synthesizing impacts, facilitating factors and outcomes of patient partnership in healthcare.

conclusionsThere is not yet a consolidated understanding of the role, activities or impacts of patient partners. Advancement of the literature has been stymied by a lack of consistently used terminology. The literature is ready to move beyond single-site descriptions, and synthesis of existing pockets of high-quality theoretical work will be essential to this evolution.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareMental HealthHumansHealth systemsPatient engagementSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36698200
PMCPMC9876419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.