Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698176›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2023

The impact of early empirical antibiotics treatment on clinical outcome of very preterm infants: a nationwide multicentre study in China.

Yao Zhu, Qing Yang, Fan Wu, Jian Mao, Ling Liu, Rong Zhang, Wei Shen, Lixia Tang, Yanmei Chang, Xiuzhen Ye and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Yao Zhu *Department of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China.
Qing Yang *Department of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China.
Fan Wu *Department of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian Mao *Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ling Liu *Department of Neonatology, Guiyang Maternity and Child Health Hospital/Guiyang Children's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Rong Zhang *Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ShenDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China.
Lixia TangDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China.
Yanmei ChangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100074, China.
Xiuzhen YeDepartment of Neonatology, Maternal and Children's Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China.
Yinping QiuDepartment of Neonatology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Li MaDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, China.
Rui ChengDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hui WuDepartment of Neonatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Dongmei ChenDepartment of Neonatology, Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
Zhi ZhengDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China.
Xiaomei TongDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100074, China. tongxm2007@126.com.
Xinzhu LinDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China. 18250809678@163.com.
Chinese Multicenter EUGR Collaborative Group
Xiamen University · CNChildren's Hospital of Fudan University · CNHospital of Hebei Province · CNNingxia Medical University General Hospital · CNJilin University · CNPeking University · CNChina Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of Jilin University · CNGuangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNNingxia Medical University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

Guidance Project of Xiamen Medical and Health in 2019 3502Z20199077Guidance Project of Xiamen Medical and Health in 2021 3502Z20214ZD1225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfants with rule-out infections are responsible for the majority of empirical antibiotics treatment (EAT) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), particularly very preterm infants (VPIs). Antibiotic overuse has been linked to adverse outcomes. There is a paucity of data on the association between EAT and clinical outcomes (containing the nutritional outcomes) of VPIs without infection-related morbidities.

methodsClinical data of VPIs admitted in 28 hospitals in 20 provinces of China from September 2019 to December 2020 were collected. EAT of VPIs was calculated as the number of days with initial usage in the first week after birth, and then categorized into 3 groups (antibiotic exposure: none, 1-4 days, and > 4 days). Clinical characteristics, nutritional status , and the short-term clinical outcomes among 3 groups were compared and analyzed.

resultsIn total, 1834 VPIs without infection-related morbidities in the first postnatal week were enrolled, including 152 cases (8.3%) without antibiotics, 374 cases (20.4%) with EAT ≤4 days and 1308 cases (71.3%) with EAT > 4 days. After adjusting for the confounding variables, longer duration of EAT was associated with decreased weight growth velocity and increased duration of reach of full enteral feeding in EAT > 4 days group (aβ: -4.83, 95% CI: - 6.12 ~ - 3.53; aβ: 2.77, 95% CI: 0.25 ~ 5.87, respectively) than those receiving no antibiotics. In addition, the risk of feeding intolerance (FI) in EAT > 4 days group was 4 times higher than that in non-antibiotic group (aOR: 4.14, 95%CI: 1.49 ~ 13.56) and 1.8 times higher than that in EAT ≤4 days group (aOR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.08 ~ 3.17). EAT > 4 days was also a risk factor for greater than or equal to stage 2 necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) than those who did not receive antibiotics (aOR: 7.68, 95%CI: 1.14 ~ 54.75) and those who received EAT ≤4 days antibiotics (aOR: 5.42, 95%CI: 1.94 ~ 14.80).

conclusionsThe EAT rate among uninfected VPIs was high in Chinese NICUs. Prolonged antibiotic exposure was associated with decreased weight growth velocity, longer duration of reach of full enteral feeding, increased risk of feeding intolerance and NEC ≥ stage 2. Future stewardship interventions to reduce EAT use should be designed and implemented.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingInfant, Premature, DiseasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalAnti-Bacterial AgentsEmpirical antibiotics treatmentNecrotizing enterocolitisVery preterm infantsWeight growth velocity

Identifiers

PMID36698176
PMCPMC9878784
OpenAlexW4318035576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.