ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2023
How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting the economic and health resilience of last mile adolescent girls and young Women in mining communities: A global and national level comparative policy analysis.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
- Engaging youth in health and research in rural Cambodia: a qualitative study.Global health action · 2026Article
- Working with goals in youth mental health and substance use service: A review of current practice guidelines and recommendations.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- End User Needs and Perspectives for a Digital Opioid Safety Tool in Adolescents and Young Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Qualitative Human-Centered Design Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Young Adults' Views on Priority Health Issues and Their Involvement in Shaping Responses: A Qualitative Exploration in South Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- Youth Participation, Agency and Well-Being in Hospital-Linked Contexts: Evidence From the KIDS Programme.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
- EQ-5D(-Y) Valuation from Adult and Child Perspectives: Where Does the Empirical Evidence Leave Us and How Should We Proceed?PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- The association of parental COVID-19 vaccination decisions with the mental health and lifestyle of children and adolescents.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Short-term transitions in health-promoting lifestyle profiles following first-time percutaneous coronary intervention: a latent profile transition analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Co-developing a framework to guide school-based substance use prevention (SSUP) interventions in Ghana.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Conceptualizing Young People's Experiences of Climate Change Awareness: A Narrative Review.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Review
- Young people's experiences and strategies for improving their awareness and access to mental health and substance use health services.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Oral Health in Young Adults: The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors and Health Literacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Adolescent and Parent Perceptions of the American College of Surgeons Safe and Effective Pain Control Brochure.Journal of pediatric surgery · 2025Article
- Preventing Meningococcal Disease in US Adolescents and Young Adults Through Vaccination.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Review
- Participation their way: a mixed methods study on engaging Australian adolescents in non-communicable disease prevention.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Comparison of Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination among Various Types of Decision Makers in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2025Article
- A hybrid model for youth engagement in adolescent health studies: insights from the teen research advisors program at a Midwestern pediatric Academic Medical Center in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A matrix tool to foster patient engagement in children, adolescents and young adults: report from a multistakeholder workshop.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Adolescent and youth-friendly health interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInternational organisations have called to increase young people's involvement in healthcare and health policy development. We currently lack effective methods for facilitating meaningful engagement by young people in health-related decision-making. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify deliberative priority setting methods and explore the effectiveness of these in engaging young people in healthcare and health policy decision-making.
methodsSeven databases were searched systematically, using MeSH and free text terms, for articles published in English before July 2021 that described the use of deliberative priority setting methods for health decision-making with young people. All titles, abstracts and full-text papers were screened by a team of six independent reviewers between them. Data extraction followed the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines. The results are presented as a narrative synthesis, structured around four components for evaluating deliberative processes: 1) representation and inclusion of diverse participants, 2) the way the process is run including levels and timing of participant engagement, 3) the quality of the information provided to participants and 4) resulting outcomes and decisions.
findingsThe search yielded 9 reviews and 21 studies. The more engaging deliberative priority setting tools involved young people-led committees, mixed methods for identifying and prioritising issues and digital data collection and communication tools. Long-term and frequent contact with young people to build trust underpinned the success of some of the tools, as did offering incentives for taking part and skills development using creative methods. The review also suggests that successful priority setting processes with young people involve consideration of power dynamics, since young people's decisions are likely to be made together with family members, health professionals and academics. DISCUSSION: Young people's engagement in decision-making about their health is best achieved through investing time in building strong relationships and ensuring young people are appropriately rewarded for their time and contribution. If young people are to be instrumental in improving their health and architects of their own futures, decision-making processes need to respect young people's autonomy and agency. Our review suggests that methods of power-sharing with young people do exist but that they have yet to be adopted by organisations and global institutions setting global health policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.