Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698116›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Reconstruction of massive bone defects after femoral tumor resection using two new-designed 3D-printed intercalary prostheses: a clinical analytic study with the cooperative utilization of multiple technologies.

Xianhao Shao, Mengmeng Dou, Qiang Yang, Jianmin Li, Ailin Zhang, Yuan Yao, Qing Chu, Ka Li, Zhenfeng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xianhao ShaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
Mengmeng DouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Qiang YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Jianmin LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Ailin ZhangPhysiotherapy department, Acute Neurosciences, the Wesley Hospital, 451 Coronation Drive, Auchenflower, QLD, 4066, Australia.
Yuan YaoDepartment of Radiography, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Qing ChuState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100037, China.
Ka LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Zhenfeng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China. osteolzf@163.com.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNShandong First Medical University · CNTianjin First Center Hospital · CNWesley Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reconstruct massive bone defects of the femoral diaphysis and proximal end with limited bilateral cortical bone after joint-preserving musculoskeletal tumor resections, two novel 3D-printed customized intercalary femoral prostheses were applied.

methodsA series of nine patients with malignancies who received these novel 3D-printed prostheses were retrospectively studied between July 2018 and November 2021. The proximal and diaphyseal femur was divided into three regions of interest (ROIs) according to anatomic landmarks, and anatomic measurements were conducted on 50 computed tomography images showing normal femurs. Based on the individual implant-involved ROIs, osteotomy level, and anatomical and biomechanical features, two alternative 3D-printed prostheses were designed. In each patient, Hounsfield Unit (HU) value thresholding and finite element analysis were conducted to identify the bone trabecula and calcar femorale and to determine the stress distribution, respectively. We described the characteristics of each prosthesis and surgical procedure and recorded the intraoperative data. All patients underwent regular postoperative follow-up, in which the clinical, functional and radiographical outcomes were evaluated.

resultsWith the ROI division and radiographic measurements, insufficient bilateral cortical bones for anchoring the traditional stem were verified in the normal proximal femur. Therefore, two 3D-printed intercalary endoprostheses, a Type A prosthesis with a proximal curved stem and a Type B prosthesis with a proximal anchorage-slot and corresponding locking screws, were designed. Based on HU value thresholding and finite element analysis, the 3D-printed proximal stems in all prostheses maximally preserved the trabecular bone and calcar femorale and optimized the biomechanical distribution, as did the proximal screws. With the 3D-printed osteotomy guide plates and reaming guide plates, all patients underwent the operation uneventfully with a satisfactory duration (325.00 ± 62.60 min) and bleeding volume (922.22 ± 222.36 ml). In the follow-up, Harris Hip and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were ameliorated after surgery (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), reliable bone ingrowth was observed, and no major complications occurred.

conclusionsTwo novel 3D-printed femoral intercalary prostheses, which achieved acceptable overall postoperative outcomes, were used as appropriate alternatives for oncologic patients with massive bone defects and limited residual bone and increased the opportunities for joint-preserving tumor resection. Several scientific methodologies utilized in this study may promote the clinical design proposals of 3D-printed implants.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsBone NeoplasmsFemoral NeoplasmsFemurHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome3D printingBone tumor resectionFemurIntercalary prosthesisJoint-preserving surgeryReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID36698116
PMCPMC9875495
OpenAlexW4317892513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.