ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023
[Older adults in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: health-related findings of the German Ageing Survey (DEAS)].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health status of the old and very old people in Germany: results of the Gesundheit 65+ study.Journal of health monitoring · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review brings together findings from the German Ageing Survey (DEAS) on the health situation of people in the second half of life during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. In doing so, this review answers the question of whether older adults (i.e., people in late adulthood) were indeed more vulnerable in the early days of the pandemic than younger adults (i.e., people in middle adulthood). Findings on the following health indicators are presented: perceived threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, perceived age discrimination, self-reported changes in physical activity, loneliness, and self-rated health.The results show that a higher age should not be considered as a universal risk factor for particularly severe indirect health consequences due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Most older adults did not perceive the COVID-19 pandemic as very threatening and rarely experienced discrimination based on their age. By contrast, many younger and older adults reported to be less physically active and they showed an increase in loneliness that was equally distributed across age groups. Moreover, self-rated health deteriorated compared to pre-pandemic levels-but only among older adults. This deterioration, however, seems to be associated with individual ageing rather than the pandemic situation.It can be concluded that older people in private households did not show a particularly unfavorable health situation in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.