Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36697918›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[Older adults in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: health-related findings of the German Ageing Survey (DEAS)].

Jenna Wünsche, Svenja M Spuling, Sonja Nowossadeck, Stefan Stuth

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jenna WünscheDeutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen, Manfred-von-Richthofen-Str. 2, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland. jenna.wuensche@dza.de.
Svenja M SpulingDeutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen, Manfred-von-Richthofen-Str. 2, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
Sonja NowossadeckDeutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen, Manfred-von-Richthofen-Str. 2, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
Stefan StuthDeutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen, Manfred-von-Richthofen-Str. 2, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
German Centre of Gerontology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review brings together findings from the German Ageing Survey (DEAS) on the health situation of people in the second half of life during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. In doing so, this review answers the question of whether older adults (i.e., people in late adulthood) were indeed more vulnerable in the early days of the pandemic than younger adults (i.e., people in middle adulthood). Findings on the following health indicators are presented: perceived threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, perceived age discrimination, self-reported changes in physical activity, loneliness, and self-rated health.The results show that a higher age should not be considered as a universal risk factor for particularly severe indirect health consequences due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Most older adults did not perceive the COVID-19 pandemic as very threatening and rarely experienced discrimination based on their age. By contrast, many younger and older adults reported to be less physically active and they showed an increase in loneliness that was equally distributed across age groups. Moreover, self-rated health deteriorated compared to pre-pandemic levels-but only among older adults. This deterioration, however, seems to be associated with individual ageing rather than the pandemic situation.It can be concluded that older people in private households did not show a particularly unfavorable health situation in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedAgingGermanyHumansPandemicsSelf ReportCovid-19 pandemicDEASHealthOlder adultsPsychosocial

Identifiers

PMID36697918
PMCPMC9876651
OpenAlexW4318038296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.