Open questions on transition metals driving secondary thermal processes in atmospheric aerosols.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Superoxide formation upon photochemical aging of secondary organic aerosols derived from biomass burning precursors.Science advances · 2026
   Article
2. Iron-Containing Seed Particles Enhance α-Pinene Secondary Organic Aerosol Mass Concentration and Dimer Formation.Environmental science & technology · 2024
   Article
3. Exposure to urban nanoparticles at low PM[Formula: see text] concentrations as a source of oxidative stress and inflammation.Scientific reports · 2023
   Article
4. Formation of nitrogen-containing gas phase products from the heterogeneous (photo)reaction of NOCommunications chemistry · 2023
   Article
5. Reactivity of aminophenols in forming nitrogen-containing brown carbon from iron-catalyzed reactions.Communications chemistry · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.