Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36697535›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2021

Exploring the octanol-water partition coefficient dataset using deep learning techniques and data augmentation.

Nadin Ulrich, Kai-Uwe Goss, Andrea Ebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Benchmarking Molecular Mutation Operators for Evolutionary Drug Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadin UlrichDepartment of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany. nadin.ulrich@ufz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0429
Kai-Uwe GossDepartment of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Andrea EbertDepartment of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-0259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today more and more data are freely available. Based on these big datasets deep neural networks (DNNs) rapidly gain relevance in computational chemistry. Here, we explore the potential of DNNs to predict chemical properties from chemical structures. We have selected the octanol-water partition coefficient (log P) as an example, which plays an essential role in environmental chemistry and toxicology but also in chemical analysis. The predictive performance of the developed DNN is good with an rmse of 0.47 log units in the test dataset and an rmse of 0.33 for an external dataset from the SAMPL6 challenge. To this end, we trained the DNN using data augmentation considering all potential tautomeric forms of the chemicals. We further demonstrate how DNN models can help in the curation of the log P dataset by identifying potential errors, and address limitations of the dataset itself.

Identifiers

PMID36697535
PMCPMC9814212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.