Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36697500›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Energy landscapes from cryo-EM snapshots: a benchmarking study.

Raison Dsouza, Ghoncheh Mashayekhi, Roshanak Etemadpour, Peter Schwander, Abbas Ourmazd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Structural basis of closed groove scrambling by a TMEM16 protein.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raison DsouzaUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukee, 3135 N. Maryland Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA.
Ghoncheh MashayekhiUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukee, 3135 N. Maryland Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA.
Roshanak EtemadpourUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukee, 3135 N. Maryland Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA.
Peter SchwanderUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukee, 3135 N. Maryland Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA.
Abbas OurmazdUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukee, 3135 N. Maryland Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA. ourmazd@uwm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecules undergo continuous conformational motions, a subset of which are functionally relevant. Understanding, and ultimately controlling biomolecular function are predicated on the ability to map continuous conformational motions, and identify the functionally relevant conformational trajectories. For equilibrium and near-equilibrium processes, function proceeds along minimum-energy pathways on one or more energy landscapes, because higher-energy conformations are only weakly occupied. With the growing interest in identifying functional trajectories, the need for reliable mapping of energy landscapes has become paramount. In response, various data-analytical tools for determining structural variability are emerging. A key question concerns the veracity with which each data-analytical tool can extract functionally relevant conformational trajectories from a collection of single-particle cryo-EM snapshots. Using synthetic data as an independently known ground truth, we benchmark the ability of four leading algorithms to determine biomolecular energy landscapes and identify the functionally relevant conformational paths on these landscapes. Such benchmarking is essential for systematic progress toward atomic-level movies of continuous biomolecular function.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCryoelectron MicroscopyMotionProtein Conformation

Identifiers

PMID36697500
PMCPMC9876912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.