Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36697443›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Preliminary comparison of the modified extraperitoneal free-PORT single incision technique and transabdominal multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Shangqing Ren, Yong Ou, Yaoqian Wang, Yi Wei, Cheng Luo, Bo Yang, Jiazheng Yuan, Qian Lv, Fang Zhou, Zhengjun Chen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative efficacy of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shangqing Ren *Department of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. rsq0516@163.com.
Yong Ou *Department of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Yaoqian Wang *Department of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Yi WeiDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Cheng LuoDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Bo YangDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Jiazheng YuanDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Qian LvDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Fang ZhouDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Zhengjun ChenDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Yu NieDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Jie LinSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan, China.
Yilei WuDepartment of Medical Records Statistics, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan, China.
Bo YangDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
Shida FanDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. 18523636523@163.com.
Dong WangDepartment of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. wangdong_robot@163.com.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNSichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the clinical efficacy of an innovative modified single-incision technique without special extraperitoneal PORT with that of transperitoneal multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and to explore the feasibility and safety of the former. A retrospective analysis was performed on 259 patients who received robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Robot Minimally Invasive Center of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital between September 2018 and August 2021. Among them were 147 cases involving extraperitoneal single incision with no special PORT (Group A) and 112 cases involving multiple incisions by the transperitoneal method (Group B). Differences in age, PSA level, Gleason score, prostate volume, body mass index, clinical stage, lower abdominal operation history, and lymph node dissection ratio between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). All operations were performed by the same operator. In this study, all 259 operations were completed successfully, and there was no conversion. There was no significant difference in transperitoneal blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, positive rate of incision margin, indwelling time of urinary catheter, satisfaction rate of immediate urine control, satisfaction rate of urine control 3 months after operation, positive rate of postoperative lymph node pathology or postoperative pathological stage between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in operation time, postoperative exhaust time and incision length (P < 0.05). The modified extraperitoneal nonspecial PORT single-incision technique is safe and feasible for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and its curative effect is similar to that of transperitoneal multi-incision RARP. It has the advantages of a short operation time, less impact on the gastrointestinal tract and a more beautiful incision. The long-term effect of treatment needs to be further confirmed by prospective studies.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleProspective StudiesProstateRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36697443
PMCPMC9877010
OpenAlexW4317941119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.