ArticleAccountability in research2024
Using AI to write scholarly publications.
Article in Accountability in research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI in academia: navigating ethical crossroads of innovation, integrity, and equity.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- How ChatGPT writes scientific titles in medical research: structural and content differences compared to human authors.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary?Accountability in research · 2026Article
- The impact of artificial intelligence on scientific production: reflections in times of intense technological and social transformation.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2026Article
- AI as a peer reviewer: a blinded comparative study of LLM-generated and human reviews in a cardiology journal.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Man vs. machine: Multi-country experimental evidence on the quality and perceptions of AI-generated research blog content.PloS one · 2026Article
- Knowledge and practices about research integrity among Peruvian university students.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Using Artificial Intelligence for Scholarly Writing.The American journal of nursing · 2025Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Urology: Navigating the Frontier of Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Challenges.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence as team member versus manual screening to conduct systematic reviews in medical sciences.iScience · 2025Article
- Scrolling surgeons: Assessment of social media and artificial intelligence usage in gynecologic oncology fellows and fellowship programs.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Opportunities and Challenges in Using Artificial Intelligence in Guideline Development and Implementation.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for optimal and careful use of generative AI in science.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Evaluating local open-source large language models for data extraction from unstructured reports on mechanical thrombectomy in patients with ischemic stroke.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluating a Large Language Model's Ability to Synthesize a Health Science Master's Thesis: Case Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Academic Research: A Review of the Consensus App.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Assistance in the Peer Review Analysis of Medical Articles: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Ethical Considerations.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Disclosing generative AI use for writing assistance should be voluntary.Research ethics · 2025Article
- Building and Beta-Testing Be Well Buddy Chatbot, a Secure, Credible and Trustworthy AI Chatbot That Will Not Misinform, Hallucinate or Stigmatize Substance Use Disorder: Development and Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.