ArticleInternational dental journal2023
Oral Health Outcome Measures: A Feasibility Evaluation.
Article in International dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile administered online among schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Establishing Reporting Requirements for Decision-Makers: A Cross-Sectional Study From a Public Dental Service in New South Wales, Australia.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOutcomes of oral health care must be measured and analysed to improve oral health care delivery, outcomes, and quality. This study aims to develop and test outcome measures for the needs of oral health organisers and explore their feasibility using clinical data.
methodsBased on the literature review and oral health advisory board, outcome measures for oral health care were identified, developed, and tested. Data from 425,000 clinical examinations were obtained from the clinical records of 8 public oral care providers in Finland.
resultsThe advisory board selected 7 outcome measures: 1 on oral self-care, 2 on periodontitis, 3 on caries, and 1 on missing teeth. A large variation was found in the diagnostic and data entry practices of these outcome measures. The coverage of caries and missing teeth entries was good, but the quality of initial and remineralised caries entries was questionable. The caries and missing teeth measures show statistically significant differences amongst some providers.
conclusionsThe measures "new cavitated caries surfaces," "cavity-free clinical examinations," and "the change in the missing value" were evaluated as feasible. The results of these measures provided insight about the effectiveness of oral care and enabled the comparison between the providers and age groups. Statistically significant differences between the providers in the measures imply potential possibilities for providers to learn from each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.