ArticleBMJ open2023
Using a generic quality of life measure to determine adherence thresholds: a cross-sectional study on older adults with neurological disorders in Germany.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMeasuring the degree of adherence to medication is essential in healthcare However, the cut-offs provided for adherence scales are often arbitrary and disease-specific, and need to be validated against a clinical outcome. Here, we used health-related quality of life (QoL) to determine cut-offs for a self-report adherence questionnaire in patients with neurological diagnoses.
designCross-sectional study.
participants910 patients (age 70±8.6 years) with neurological disorders were recruited from the wards of neurology at a local university hospital. All patients received a comprehensive geriatric assessment, including assessments of adherence (Stendal Adherence to Medication Score, SAMS) and QoL (Short Form Survey SF-36). OUTCOME MEASURES: The main aim of the study was to define a cut-off for non-adherence at which QoL is significantly impaired. Thus, we used Spearman's rank correlation, multivariate and univariate analyses of variance to test the impact of different adherence levels on QoL. Receiver operating characteristics and area under curve measures were then used to determine cut-off scores for adherence based on significant differences in QoL.
resultsCorrelations between SAMS and SF-36 domains were weak (ranging between r=-0.205 for emotional well-being and r=-0.094 for pain) and the effect of non-adherence on QoL disappeared in the multivariate analysis of variance (p=0.522) after adjusting for demographical and clinical factors. SAMS cut-offs in terms of SF-36 domains varied greatly, so that an overall SAMS cut-off for this cohort could not be defined.
conclusionsQoL as measured by the SF-36 is not suitable as a single outcome parameter to study the impact of non-adherence on QoL in a mixed neurological cohort. Since both QoL and adherence are heterogeneous, multifaceted constructs, it is unlikely to find an overarching cut-off applicable for all patients. Thus, it may be necessary to use disease or cohort-specific external outcome parameters to measure the indirect effect of interventions to enhance adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00016774.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.