Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36697045›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Preferences, barriers and facilitators regarding virtual pelvic healthcare in individuals with gynaecological cancers: protocol for a patient-oriented, mixed-methods study.

Stéphanie Bernard, Puneeta Tandon, Alexandra Waters, Sabrina Selmani, Ericka Wiebe, Jill Turner, Sinead Dufour, Margaret L McNeely

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Commentary on Scodras et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2025
    Article
  4. Overview of sexual dysfunction in patients with cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Stéphanie BernardDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada sbernar1@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1454-8555
Puneeta TandonFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Alexandra WatersDépartement de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Bas-St-Laurent, Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
Sabrina SelmaniDépartement de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Bas-St-Laurent, Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
Ericka WiebeFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jill TurnerCross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sinead DufourSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9484-1606
Margaret L McNeelyDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4376-4847
Alberta Health Services · CACentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Bas-Saint-Laurent · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaginal pain during intercourse and urinary incontinence are common complaints after gynaecological cancer treatments. Pelvic health physiotherapy treatments aim at optimising function through education on the use of vaginal moisturisers, dilation therapy programme and pelvic floor muscle training. Given that barriers such as time, travel, and costs are known to limit access to physiotherapy services, a virtual pelvic health physiotherapy programme may help to facilitate access. The primary objective of this study is to identify preferences, barriers and facilitators from individuals with gynaecological cancer regarding virtual pelvic healthcare survivorship care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This patient-oriented, mixed-methods study will involve an online cross-sectional survey data (phase I) and qualitative data from a series of virtual focus groups (phase II). PHASE I: an anonymous survey will be used to assess the demographics, health status, prevalence of urogenital symptoms, as well as knowledge, barriers and facilitators to pelvic health services of people with gynaecological cancer. A total of N=50 participants from Canada will be recruited through convenience and self-selection sampling. PHASE II: a series of virtual semi-structured focus groups will be conducted with 10-15 participants on key topics related to virtual pelvic healthcare. Interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed, from which key themes and quotes will be identified. An interpretive description qualitative method will guide analysis and implementation of results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval from the Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta-Cancer Committee (HREBA.CC-21-0498) and of the CISSS Bas-Saint-Laurent (CISSSBSL-2021-10) have been obtained. Informed, electronically signed consent will be required from all participants. Results from this work will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be used to inform the development and implementation of a new Pelvic eHealth Module for individuals treated for gynaecological cancers. This module will be incorporated into a comprehensive educational and exercise programme offered by a web-based application.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareNeoplasmsAlbertaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPelvic FloorQualitative Researchgynaecological oncologyqualitative researchrehabilitation medicineurogynaecology

Identifiers

PMID36697045
PMCPMC9884898
OpenAlexW4318168656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.