Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36697038›Full record

ArticleRMD open2023

Quantitative infrapatellar fat pad signal intensity alteration as an imaging biomarker of knee osteoarthritis progression.

Han Cen, Qingran Yan, Tao Meng, Zhongshan Chen, Jimin Zhu, Yuanyuan Wang, Guangfeng Ruan, Tian Wang, Weiyu Han, David Hunter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Han Cen *Clinical Research Centre, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9251-2331
Qingran Yan *Department of Rheumatology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Tao MengDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhongshan ChenMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Jimin ZhuMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Yuanyuan WangMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Guangfeng RuanMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Tian WangMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Weiyu HanClinical Research Centre, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
David HunterClinical Research Centre, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Changhai DingClinical Research Centre, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Changhai.Ding@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9479-730X
University of Tasmania · AUAnhui Medical University · CNRenji Hospital · CNThe University of Sydney · AUZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

DATA COORDINATING CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVEN01AR22258 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NEVITT, MICHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$13.5M
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVEN01AR22259 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HOCHBERG, MARC C. · 2007 to 2011
$7.8M
Clinical Centers for the Osteoarthritis Initiative^Rhode IslandN01AR22262 · NIAMS · MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLAND · PI EATON, CHARLES B. · 2007 to 2010
$6.8M
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVEN01AR22261 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FDN · PI JACKSON, REBECCA · 2007 to 2011
$6.2M
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVEN01AR22260 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 2007 to 2010
$6.1M
NEW PHARMACOLOGY ASPECTS RELATED TO CARBONIC ANHYDRASER01HL022258 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MAREN, THOMAS H · 1985 to 1986
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-N01AR22260N01AR022260 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH · PI KWOH, KENT · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-N01AR22261N01AR022261 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH · PI JACKSON, REBECCA · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS-264022262-264022262N01AR022262 · NIAMS · THE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL · PI ASSAF, ANNLOUISE R. · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-264022259-264022259N01AR022259 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT BALT · PI HOCHBERG, MARC C. · 2002 to 2006
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000021CNHLBI NIH HHS N01AR22258NIAMS NIH HHS N01AR22259NIAMS NIH HHS N01AR22260NIAMS NIH HHS N01AR22261NIAMS NIH HHS N01AR22262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the association of quantitative infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) signal intensity alteration with knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression.

methodThis study was performed based on the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health OA Biomarkers Consortium study, a nested case-control study consisting of 600 participants. The IPFP signal intensity alterations were quantitatively measured at baseline, 12 months and 24 months. The associations of baseline and time-integrated values over 12 and 24 months of IPFP signal intensity measures with knee OA progression over 48 months were evaluated with adjustment for baseline confounders.

resultsThe baseline level of clustering effect of high signal intensity (Clustering factor (H)) was predictive of clinically relevant progression (both radiographic and pain progression) (OR 1.22). The time-integrated values of all IPFP signal intensity measures, except for mean value of IPFP signal intensity (Mean (IPFP)) over 24 months (ORs ranging from 1.23 to 1.39) as well was all except for Mean (IPFP) and mean value of IPFP high signal intensity (Mean (H)) over 12 months (ORs ranging from 1.20 to 1.31), were positively associated with clinically relevant progression. When the associations of quantitative IPFP signal intensity measures with radiographic and pain progression were examined separately, more IPFP signal intensity measures with stronger effect sizes were associated with radiographic progression compared with pain progression.

conclusionThe associations of short-term alteration in quantitative IPFP signal intensity measures with long-term knee OA progression suggest that these measures might serve as efficacy of intervention biomarkers of knee OA.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeAdipose TissueBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPainUnited StatesBiomarkersepidemiologymagnetic resonance imagingosteoarthritis, knee

Identifiers

PMID36697038
PMCPMC9884854
OpenAlexW4317938053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.