Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36697034›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2023

Improvement and implementation of a national individual care plan in paediatric palliative care: a study protocol.

Chantal Y Joren, Marijke C Kars, Leontien C M Kremer, Hester Rippen, A A Eduard Verhagen, Judith L Aris-Meijer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chantal Y JorenFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands c.y.joren@umcg.nl.
Marijke C KarsCenter of Expertise in Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Center of Health and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leontien C M KremerPrincess Maxima Centre for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hester RippenDutch Foundation Child and Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A A Eduard VerhagenDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Judith L Aris-MeijerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLHersenstichting · NLPrincess Máxima Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPaediatric palliative care (PPC) is care for children with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions, and can involve complex high-tech care, which can last for months or years. In 2015, the National Individual Care Plan (ICP) for PPC was developed and has shown to be successful. The ICP can be seen as an instrument to facilitate coordination, quality and continuity of PPC. However, in practice, an ICP is often completed too late and for too few children. We aim to improve the coordination, quality and continuity of care for every child with a life-threatening or life-limiting condition and his/her family by further developing and implementing the ICP in the Netherlands. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To evaluate the original ICP, ICP 1.0, interviews and questionnaires will be held among parents of children who have or have had an ICP 1.0 and healthcare professionals (HCPs) who used ICP 1.0. Based on the results, ICP 1.0 will be further developed. An implementation strategy will be written and the renewed ICP, ICP 2.0, will be nationally tested in an implementation period of approximately 7 months. During the implementation period, ICP 2.0 will be used for all children who are registered with Children's Palliative Care teams. After the implementation period, ICP 2.0 will be evaluated using interviews and questionnaires among parents of children who received ICP 2.0 and HPCs who worked with ICP 2.0. Based on these results, ICP 2.0 will be further optimised into the final version: ICP 3.0. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethical approval. The ICP 3.0 will be disseminated through the Dutch Centre of Expertise in Children's Palliative Care, to ensure wide availability for the general public and HCPs within PPC. Additionally, we aim to publish study results in open-access, peer-reviewed journals and to present results at national and international scientific meetings.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareChildFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleNetherlandsParentsPalliative Care

Identifiers

PMID36697034
PMCPMC9884846
OpenAlexW4317938117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.