Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36696724›Full record

ReviewHearing research2023

Quantitative models of auditory cortical processing.

Srivatsun Sadagopan, Manaswini Kar, Satyabrata Parida

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srivatsun SadagopanDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: vatsun@pitt.edu.
Manaswini KarDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Satyabrata ParidaDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
Neural mechanisms underlying vocalization perception in realistic listening conditionsR01DC017141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SADAGOPAN, SRIVATSUN · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To generate insight from experimental data, it is critical to understand the inter-relationships between individual data points and place them in context within a structured framework. Quantitative modeling can provide the scaffolding for such an endeavor. Our main objective in this review is to provide a primer on the range of quantitative tools available to experimental auditory neuroscientists. Quantitative modeling is advantageous because it can provide a compact summary of observed data, make underlying assumptions explicit, and generate predictions for future experiments. Quantitative models may be developed to characterize or fit observed data, to test theories of how a task may be solved by neural circuits, to determine how observed biophysical details might contribute to measured activity patterns, or to predict how an experimental manipulation would affect neural activity. In complexity, quantitative models can range from those that are highly biophysically realistic and that include detailed simulations at the level of individual synapses, to those that use abstract and simplified neuron models to simulate entire networks. Here, we survey the landscape of recently developed models of auditory cortical processing, highlighting a small selection of models to demonstrate how they help generate insight into the mechanisms of auditory processing. We discuss examples ranging from models that use details of synaptic properties to explain the temporal pattern of cortical responses to those that use modern deep neural networks to gain insight into human fMRI data. We conclude by discussing a biologically realistic and interpretable model that our laboratory has developed to explore aspects of vocalization categorization in the auditory pathway.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionHumansModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAuditory cortexComputationModelingNeural networksQuantitative analysisVocalizations

Identifiers

PMID36696724
PMCPMC9928778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.